266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25674698)
1. 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements.
Davda K; Smyth N; Cobb JP; Hart AJ
Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 25674698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA.
Zheng G; von Recum J; Nolte LP; Grützner PA; Steppacher SD; Franke J
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2012 Mar; 7(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 21792672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The reliability of the anterior pelvic plane for computer navigated acetabular component placement during total hip arthroplasty: prospective study with the EOS imaging system.
Barbier O; Skalli W; Mainard L; Mainard D;
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Oct; 100(6 Suppl):S287-91. PubMed ID: 25129705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of inter- and intra-observer reliability in the determination of radiographic version and inclination of the cup in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.
Reito A; Puolakka T; Paakkala A; Pajamäki J
Int Orthop; 2012 Mar; 36(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 21837449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cup version can be accurately measured on the false profile view radiograph.
Lee JK; Sardana V; White C; Speirs A; Beaulé PE
Hip Int; 2014; 24(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 24970323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is transverse acetabular ligament a reliable guide for aligning cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty?: A measurement by CT arthrography in 90 hips.
Yoon BH; Ha YC; Lee YK; Jo WL; Lee KM; Koo KH
J Orthop Sci; 2016 Mar; 21(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 26714668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a new method for determination of cup orientation in THA.
Steppacher SD; Tannast M; Zheng G; Zhang X; Kowal J; Anderson SE; Siebenrock KA; Murphy SB
J Orthop Res; 2009 Dec; 27(12):1583-8. PubMed ID: 19544389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Large ball metal on metal hips obscure cup angle measurement on plain radiographs.
Hart AJ; Dandachli W; Schlueter-Brust K; Henckel J; Cobb J
Hip Int; 2009; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 20041378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Conventional cup navigation with 2D fluoroscopy in THA: accurate cup positioning respecting pelvic tilt].
Pichl J; Kremer M; Hoffmann R
Z Orthop Unfall; 2011 Oct; 149(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 21480171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Worlicek M; Weber M; Zeman F; Wörner M; Schneider M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B
Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 27355814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement.
Eilander W; Harris SJ; Henkus HE; Cobb JP; Hogervorst T
Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 24078527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Poor Acetabular Component Orientation Increases Revision Risk in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty.
Tauriainen TJT; Niinimäki TT; Niinimäki JL; Nousiainen TOP; Leppilahti JI
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jul; 32(7):2204-2207. PubMed ID: 28291650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement.
Kalteis T; Handel M; Herold T; Perlick L; Paetzel C; Grifka J
Eur J Radiol; 2006 May; 58(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 16289687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of cup orientation in hip resurfacing: a comparison of TraumaCad and computed tomography.
Westacott DJ; McArthur J; King RJ; Foguet P
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Apr; 8():8. PubMed ID: 23577620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.
Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P
Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer assisted determination of acetabular cup orientation using 2D-3D image registration.
Zheng G; Zhang X
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2010 Sep; 5(5):437-47. PubMed ID: 20180034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty.
Arai N; Nakamura S; Matsushita T; Suzuki S
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 19442484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-Dimensional Host Bone Coverage Required in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip and Its Relationship With 2-Dimensional Coverage.
Ueno T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Ohmori T; Yoshitani J; Tsuchiya H
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jan; 34(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 30342952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
