107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25674953)
1. The preference toward identified victims and rescue duties.
Żuradzki T
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):25-7. PubMed ID: 25674953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Rethinking rescue medicine.
Jecker NS
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):12-8. PubMed ID: 25674949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rethinking the rescue paradigm.
Parsi K
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 25674947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rescue, strangers, and research participants.
Wachbroit R
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 25674951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Seeking context for the duty to rescue: contractualism and trust in research institutions.
Meagher KM
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 25674950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The emotional nature of rescue medicine assessments.
Salmeron BJ
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):27-9. PubMed ID: 25674954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rescue obligations and collective approaches: complexities in genomics.
Fenwick A; Dheensa S; Crawford G; Shkedi-Rafid S; Lucassen A
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):23-5. PubMed ID: 25674952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Collectivizing rescue obligations in bioethics.
Garrett JR
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):3-11. PubMed ID: 25674948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Duties to rescue: individual, professional and institutional.
Douglas T
J Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 42(4):207-8. PubMed ID: 27004742
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The duty to rescue in genomic research.
Ulrich M
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):50-1. PubMed ID: 23391064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rescuing the duty to rescue.
Rulli T; Millum J
J Med Ethics; 2016 Apr; 42(4):260-4. PubMed ID: 24790055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Legal implications of an ethical duty to search for genetic incidental findings.
Price WN
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 23391063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A perspective from clinical providers and patients: researchers' duty to actively look for genetic incidental findings.
Ross KM; Reiff M
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):56-8. PubMed ID: 23391067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?
Gliwa C; Berkman BE
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):32-42. PubMed ID: 23391059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reframing the ethical debate regarding incidental findings in genetic research.
Garrett JR
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):44-6. PubMed ID: 23391061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Managing incidental findings: lessons from neuroimaging.
Borgelt E; Anderson JA; Illes J
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 23391062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genomic incidental findings: reducing the burden to be fair.
Anastasova V; Blasimme A; Julia S; Cambon-Thomsen A
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):52-4. PubMed ID: 23391065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Nirvana fallacy and the return of results.
Biesecker LG
Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 23391060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Do firms with unique competencies for rescuing victims of human catastrophes have special obligations? Corporate responsibility and the AIDS catastrophe in sub-Saharan Africa.
Dunfee TW
Bus Ethics Q; 2006 Apr; 16(2):185-210. PubMed ID: 17162832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualifying confidentiality obligations.
Banja JD
Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(2):28-9; discussion W32-4. PubMed ID: 16500844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]