126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25675038)
21. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Shah CA; Beck T; Liao JB; Giannakopoulos NV; Veljovich D; Paley P
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e82. PubMed ID: 29027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic staging surgery in treating endometrial cancer: 20 years of follow-up.
Lee CL; Kusunoki S; Huang KG; Wu KY; Huang CY; Yen CF
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 27590380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of laparoscopic surgery in gynecological oncology.
Chang WC; Lee LC; Huang SC; Sheu BC
J Formos Med Assoc; 2010 Aug; 109(8):558-66. PubMed ID: 20708506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing robotic surgery with conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer management.
Chen CH; Chiu LH; Chang CW; Yen YK; Huang YH; Liu WM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Jul; 24(6):1105-11. PubMed ID: 24927245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in obese women with early-stage cervical cancer.
Moss EL; Balega J; Chan KK; Singh K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22080890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy as a diagnostic procedure for lymph node recurrence of gynaecological cancers.
Sanjuán A; Illa M; Torné A; Román SM; Jurado M; Lejarcegui JA; Pahisa J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 17486474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Complications of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy in gynaecologic oncology. A series of 1102 procedures in 915 patients].
Cartron G; Leblanc E; Ferron G; Martel P; Narducci F; Querleu D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 May; 33(5):304-14. PubMed ID: 15914073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The role of laparoscopy in staging of different gynaecological cancers.
Tse KY; Ngan HY
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Aug; 29(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 25819676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Feasibility and fiability of laparoscopic surgery in the uterine cancers in normal-weight patients].
Levêque C; Ferron G; Martinez A; Rafii A; Filleron T; Querleu D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Oct; 42(10):668-73. PubMed ID: 25245841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology.
Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Walz J; Bannier M; Buttarelli M; Gurriet B; De Laparrent T; Blache JL
Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2743-7. PubMed ID: 18814002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic
Ye X; Kang WM; Yu JC; Ma ZQ; Xue ZG
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Jul; 23(25):4595-4603. PubMed ID: 28740348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Feasibility, safety, and cost outcomes of laparoscopic management of early endometrial and cervical malignancy.
Hilaris GE; Tsoubis T; Konstantopoulos V; Pavlakis K
JSLS; 2009; 13(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 20202389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical and Oncological Outcome of Robotic Surgery Compared With Laparoscopic and Abdominal Surgery in the Management of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Saltari M; Mancini E; Sindico S; Vici P; Sergi D; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Pomati G; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 26825826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up.
Park NY; Chong GO; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Feb; 21(2):355-62. PubMed ID: 21270616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
