353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25675064)
1. Medical journal peer review: process and bias.
Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 25675064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conflicts of interest in medical science: peer usage, peer review and 'CoI consultancy'.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 15236772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
Suzuki K; Edelson A; Iversen LL; Hausmann L; Schulz JB; Turner AJ
J Neurochem; 2016 Oct; 139 Suppl 2():17-23. PubMed ID: 27534728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer review of the biomedical literature.
Olson CM
Am J Emerg Med; 1990 Jul; 8(4):356-8. PubMed ID: 2194471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Journal policy on ethics in scientific publication.
Callaham ML
Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 12514687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication.
Babalola O; Grant-Kels JM; Parish LC
Clin Dermatol; 2012; 30(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 22330669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Submitting a manuscript for peer review--integrity, integrity, integrity.
Murphy SP; Bulman C; Shariati B; Hausmann L;
J Neurochem; 2014 Feb; 128(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 24410543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
Tarkang EE; Bain LE
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Peer review: a closed system in need of reform].
Thörn A
Lakartidningen; 2002 Jul; 99(30-31):3106-8. PubMed ID: 12198928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide.
Kelly J; Sadeghieh T; Adeli K
EJIFCC; 2014 Oct; 25(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 27683470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revealing the faults in medical journals.
Liesegang TJ
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19333735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health.
Cantekin EI; McGuire TW; Potter RL
JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1427-30. PubMed ID: 2078202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The peer review process: a primer for
Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW
J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
Lamb CR; Adams CA
Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers].
Alfonso F
Neurologia; 2010; 25(9):521-9. PubMed ID: 21093700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer.
Faggion CM
Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
