BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25675877)

  • 1. The DalHouses: 100 new photographs of houses with ratings of typicality, familiarity, and degree of similarity to faces.
    Filliter JH; Glover JM; McMullen PA; Salmon JP; Johnson SA
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):178-83. PubMed ID: 25675877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.
    Faerber SJ; Kaufmann JM; Leder H; Martin EM; Schweinberger SR
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155380. PubMed ID: 27168323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The many faces of a face: Comparing stills and videos of facial expressions in eight dimensions (SAVE database).
    Garrido MV; Lopes D; Prada M; Rodrigues D; Jerónimo R; Mourão RP
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 27573005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiarity breeds attraction: effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces.
    Peskin M; Newell FN
    Perception; 2004; 33(2):147-57. PubMed ID: 15109158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study.
    Marzi T; Viggiano MP
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is typical is good: the influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness.
    Sofer C; Dotsch R; Wigboldus DH; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Jan; 26(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25512052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The City Infant Faces Database: A validated set of infant facial expressions.
    Webb R; Ayers S; Endress A
    Behav Res Methods; 2018 Feb; 50(1):151-159. PubMed ID: 28205132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of face and non-face stimuli in autistic spectrum disorder.
    Arkush L; Smith-Collins AP; Fiorentini C; Skuse DH
    Autism Res; 2013 Dec; 6(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 23894016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatiotemporal changes in neural response patterns to faces varying in visual familiarity.
    Natu VS; O'Toole AJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():151-9. PubMed ID: 25524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of facial color and inversion on the N170 event-related potential (ERP) component.
    Minami T; Nakajima K; Changvisommid L; Nakauchi S
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 311():341-8. PubMed ID: 26477984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What makes a face photo a 'good likeness'?
    Ritchie KL; Kramer RSS; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():1-8. PubMed ID: 28917125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Nencki Affective Picture System (NAPS): introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database.
    Marchewka A; Zurawski Ł; Jednoróg K; Grabowska A
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):596-610. PubMed ID: 23996831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prototypicality and intensity of emotional faces using an anchor-point method.
    Sánchez A; Vázquez C
    Span J Psychol; 2013; 16():E7. PubMed ID: 23866254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age of face matters: age-group differences in ratings of young and old faces.
    Ebner NC
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 18411535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On second glance: still no high-level pop-out effect for faces.
    VanRullen R
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):3017-27. PubMed ID: 16125749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data.
    Ma DS; Correll J; Wittenbrink B
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1122-1135. PubMed ID: 25582810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Positive and negative emotion enhances the processing of famous faces in a semantic judgment task.
    Bate S; Haslam C; Hodgson TL; Jansari A; Gregory N; Kay J
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Jan; 24(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 20063949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orientation biases for facial emotion recognition during childhood and adulthood.
    Balas B; Huynh C; Saville A; Schmidt J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Dec; 140():171-83. PubMed ID: 26247810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facial typicality and attractiveness reflect an ideal dimension of face structure.
    Trujillo LT; Anderson EM
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101541. PubMed ID: 36587465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal perception of Mooney faces in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence from the N170 component and rapid neural adaptation.
    Towler J; Gosling A; Duchaine B; Eimer M
    J Neuropsychol; 2016 Mar; 10(1):15-32. PubMed ID: 25237758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.