These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25675877)

  • 21. Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces.
    Vokey JR; Read JD
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 1508054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Automatic detection of orientation changes of faces versus non-face objects: a visual MMN study.
    Wang W; Miao D; Zhao L
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Jul; 100():71-8. PubMed ID: 24859423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Effects of impression of faces on recognition of changes in face arrays: addition versus deletion].
    Shirasawa S; Hakoda Y; Ikeda Y; Haraguchi M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2000 Dec; 71(5):403-7. PubMed ID: 11247286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Specificity of face processing without awareness.
    Zhou G; Zhang L; Liu J; Yang J; Qu Z
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):408-12. PubMed ID: 20116293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variation in Photos of the Same Face Drives Improvements in Identity Verification.
    Menon N; White D; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1332-41. PubMed ID: 26562899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A visual object stimulus database with standardized similarity information.
    Migo EM; Montaldi D; Mayes AR
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Jun; 45(2):344-54. PubMed ID: 23055161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Familiarity and face emotion recognition in patients with schizophrenia.
    Lahera G; Herrera S; Fernández C; Bardón M; de los Ángeles V; Fernández-Liria A
    Compr Psychiatry; 2014 Jan; 55(1):199-205. PubMed ID: 23993221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The brain response to personally familiar faces in autism: findings of fusiform activity and beyond.
    Pierce K; Haist F; Sedaghat F; Courchesne E
    Brain; 2004 Dec; 127(Pt 12):2703-16. PubMed ID: 15319275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of contrast polarity reversal on face detection: evidence of perceptual asymmetry from sweep VEP.
    Liu-Shuang J; Ales JM; Rossion B; Norcia AM
    Vision Res; 2015 Mar; 108():8-19. PubMed ID: 25595857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Where and how infants look: the development of scan paths and fixations in face perception.
    Kato M; Konishi Y
    Infant Behav Dev; 2013 Feb; 36(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 23261787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An adaptation study of internal and external features in facial representations.
    Hills C; Romano K; Davies-Thompson J; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():18-28. PubMed ID: 24747020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space.
    Hopper WJ; Finklea KM; Winkielman P; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1779-88. PubMed ID: 25151105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fast face recognition: eye blink as a reliable behavioral response.
    Usakli AB; Susac A; Gurkan S
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Oct; 504(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 21911038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Component structure of individual differences in true and false recognition of faces.
    Bartlett JC; Shastri KK; Abdi H; Neville-Smith M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1207-30. PubMed ID: 19686016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Rapid face-selective adaptation of an early extrastriate component in MEG.
    Harris A; Nakayama K
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Jan; 17(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 16436684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The validity of composite photographs for assessing masculinity preferences.
    Scott IM; Penton-Voak IS
    Perception; 2011; 40(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 21692423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Categorical perception of familiarity: Evidence for a hyper-familiarity in schizophrenia.
    Horn M; D'Hondt F; Vaiva G; Thomas P; Pins D
    J Psychiatr Res; 2015 Dec; 71():63-9. PubMed ID: 26452199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.