These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25676122)

  • 1. S-ketamine influences strategic allocation of attention but not exogenous capture of attention.
    Fuchs I; Ansorge U; Huber-Huber C; Höflich A; Lanzenberger R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():282-94. PubMed ID: 25676122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):737-48. PubMed ID: 25520044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors.
    Ansorge U; Becker SI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jan; 74(1):83-104. PubMed ID: 22016048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exogenous attentional capture by subliminal abrupt-onset cues: evidence from contrast-polarity independent cueing effects.
    Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):974-88. PubMed ID: 23106374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inhibition of return in the human 5HT2A agonist and NMDA antagonist model of psychosis.
    Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E; Heekeren K; Neukirch A; Stoll M; Stock C; Daumann J; Obradovic M; Kovar KA
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2006 Feb; 31(2):431-41. PubMed ID: 16123739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The illusion of control: Sequential dependencies underlie contingent attentional capture.
    Huffman G; Antinucci VM; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2238-2244. PubMed ID: 29330680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition of return is no hallmark of exogenous capture by unconscious cues.
    Fuchs I; Ansorge U
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():30. PubMed ID: 22375115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the top-down contingent capture of attention for abrupt-onset cues: Evidence from cue-elicited N2pc.
    Goller F; Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Nov; 57(11):e13655. PubMed ID: 32790903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 29766295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory and visual capture during focused visual attention.
    Koelewijn T; Bronkhorst A; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1303-15. PubMed ID: 19803638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of a sub-anaesthetic dose of ketamine on human selective attention.
    Oranje B; van Berckel BN; Kemner C; van Ree JM; Kahn RS; Verbaten MN
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2000 Mar; 22(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 10693157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The contribution of color to attention capture effects during search for onset targets.
    Goller F; Ditye T; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):789-807. PubMed ID: 26742497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex and its attentional modulation in the human S-ketamine and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) models of psychosis.
    Heekeren K; Neukirch A; Daumann J; Stoll M; Obradovic M; Kovar KA; Geyer MA; Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E
    J Psychopharmacol; 2007 May; 21(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 17591658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ketamine perturbs perception of the flow of time in healthy volunteers.
    Coull JT; Morgan H; Cambridge VC; Moore JW; Giorlando F; Adapa R; Corlett PR; Fletcher PC
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2011 Dec; 218(3):543-56. PubMed ID: 21603893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A unitary focus of spatial attention during attentional capture: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Grubert A; Righi LL; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(3):9. PubMed ID: 23641076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategic top-down control versus attentional bias by previous reward history.
    Lynn J; Shin M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2207-16. PubMed ID: 26041273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acute and chronic effects of ketamine on semantic priming: modeling schizophrenia?
    Stefanovic A; Brandner B; Klaassen E; Cregg R; Nagaratnam M; Bromley LM; Das RK; Rossell SL; Morgan CJ; Curran HV
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2009 Apr; 29(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 19512973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments.
    Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1574-84. PubMed ID: 25832193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Appetitive and aversive outcome associations modulate exogenous cueing.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2253-65. PubMed ID: 27146992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue frequency modulates cuing effect either in the presence or in the absence of distractors.
    Yoon Y; Jung S; Jeoung K; Ha SJ; Kim D; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():73-79. PubMed ID: 30597422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.