These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25676199)

  • 21. 23andMe: a new two-sided data-banking market model.
    Stoeklé HC; Mamzer-Bruneel MF; Vogt G; Hervé C
    BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Mar; 17():19. PubMed ID: 27059184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Finding a Clear Path Forward.
    Seward B
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2018 Jul; 52(4):482-488. PubMed ID: 29714553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. RECONCEPTUALIZING CONSENT FOR DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER HEALTH SERVICES.
    Spector-Bagdady K
    Am J Law Med; 2015; 41(4):568-616. PubMed ID: 26863850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Legislation on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in seven European countries.
    Borry P; van Hellemondt RE; Sprumont D; Jales CF; Rial-Sebbag E; Spranger TM; Curren L; Kaye J; Nys H; Howard H
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2012 Jul; 20(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 22274578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts--should health professionals be concerned?
    Skirton H
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2015; 11():4. PubMed ID: 26085310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals.
    McGrath SP; Walton N; Williams MS; Kim KK; Bastola K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Nov; 19(1):844. PubMed ID: 31760949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of european guidelines, recommendations, and position statements.
    Rafiq M; Ianuale C; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2015 Oct; 19(10):535-47. PubMed ID: 26313927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statement of the ESHG on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.
    European Society of Human Genetics
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2010 Dec; 18(12):1271-3. PubMed ID: 20736974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct-to-Consumer Nutrigenetics Testing: An Overview.
    Floris M; Cano A; Porru L; Addis R; Cambedda A; Idda ML; Steri M; Ventura C; Maioli M
    Nutrients; 2020 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 32098227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Helping Patients Make Informed Choices.
    Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2018 Feb; 22(1):33-36. PubMed ID: 29350705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: to test or not to test, that is the question.
    Dandara C; Greenberg J; Lambie L; Lombard Z; Naicker T; Ramesar R; Ramsay M; Roberts L; Theron M; Venter P; Bardien-Kruger S
    S Afr Med J; 2013 Jul; 103(8):510-2. PubMed ID: 23885726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. All your data (effectively) belong to us: data practices among direct-to-consumer genetic testing firms.
    Laestadius LI; Rich JR; Auer PL
    Genet Med; 2017 May; 19(5):513-520. PubMed ID: 27657678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies tell their customers to 'see a genetic counselor'. How do genetic counselors feel about direct-to-consumer genetic testing?
    Hsieh V; Braid T; Gordon E; Hercher L
    J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):191-197. PubMed ID: 32706156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for addiction susceptibility: a premature commercialisation of doubtful validity and value.
    Mathews R; Hall W; Carter A
    Addiction; 2012 Dec; 107(12):2069-74. PubMed ID: 22510165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medicine, market and communication: ethical considerations in regard to persuasive communication in direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.
    Schaper M; Schicktanz S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):56. PubMed ID: 29871685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Slovenia: availability, ethical dilemmas and legislation.
    Vrecar I; Peterlin B; Teran N; Lovrecic L
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2015; 25(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 25672471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Third party interpretation of raw genetic data: an ethical exploration.
    Badalato L; Kalokairinou L; Borry P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Nov; 25(11):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 28832567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The dawn of consumer-directed testing.
    Ramos E; Weissman SM
    Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet; 2018 Mar; 178(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 29512889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Personal utility is inherent to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.
    Chung MW; Ng JC
    J Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 42(10):649-52. PubMed ID: 27250638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A survey of direct-to-consumer teledermatology services available to US patients: Explosive growth, opportunities and controversy.
    Fogel AL; Sarin KY
    J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Jan; 23(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 26729755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.