198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25676369)
21. Evaluation of the body fluid mode of automated hematology analyzer XN-series for extremely low peripheral white blood cell counts.
Tanaka Y; Matsushita H; Tanaka Y; Maruki Y; Kondo T; Asai S; Miyachi H
Int J Lab Hematol; 2014 Feb; 36(1):e3-7. PubMed ID: 23718220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the AcT 5 diff autoloader hematology analyzer to the Abbott Cell-Dyn 3200 analyzer at Charlevoix Area Hospital.
Rogers S
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 14521324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples.
Meintker L; Ringwald J; Rauh M; Krause SW
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 May; 139(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 23596116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Characterizing blood cells by biophysical measurements in flow.
Groner W; Tycko D
Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):141-57. PubMed ID: 6929718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Flowcytometric analysis of basophil counts in human blood and inaccuracy of hematology analyzers.
Ducrest S; Meier F; Tschopp C; Pavlovic R; Dahinden CA
Allergy; 2005 Nov; 60(11):1446-50. PubMed ID: 16197480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Counting of leukocytes in samples from G-CSF mobilized donors, leukapheresis products, and cord blood: the performances of an analyzer with dedicated profiles.
Pierelli L; Fioravanti D; Patti D; Iudicone P; Scocchera R; Pandolfi A; Nuti M
Int J Lab Hematol; 2012 Apr; 34(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 21895988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A flagging system for multichannel hematology analyzers.
Koepke JA; Dotson MA; Shifman MA; Boyarsky MW
Blood Cells; 1985; 11(1):113-25. PubMed ID: 4074886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance evaluation of a hematology blood counter with five-part leukocyte differential capability.
Davis BH; Bigelow NC
Am Clin Lab; 1999; 18(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 10848432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Performance evaluation of the immature granulocyte parameter on the Sysmex XE-2100 automated hematology analyzer.
Field D; Taube E; Heumann S
Lab Hematol; 2006; 12(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 16513542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of hematological values obtained with reference automated hematology analyzers of six manufacturers.
Takubo T; Tatsumi N; Satoh N; Matsuno K; Fujimoto K; Soga M; Yamagami Y; Akiba S; Sudoh T; Miyazaki M
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 2002; 33 Suppl 2():62-7. PubMed ID: 12755270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Hematological analysis of leukemic diseases using an automated hematology analyzer].
Shigeta H
Rinsho Byori; 1993 Dec; 41(12):1279-88. PubMed ID: 8295337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A clinical trial of three-part electronic differential white blood cell counts.
Charache S; Nelson L; Keyser E; Metzger P
Arch Intern Med; 1985 Oct; 145(10):1852-5. PubMed ID: 3899037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance evaluation and result comparison of the automated hematology analyzers Abbott CD 3700, Sysmex XE 2100 and Coulter LH 750 for cell counts in serous fluids.
Yang D; Zhou Y; Chen B
Clin Chim Acta; 2013 Apr; 419():113-8. PubMed ID: 23415694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Advances of the past decade in automated hematology.
Gulati GL; Hyun BH; Ashton JK
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Oct; 98(4 Suppl 1):S11-6. PubMed ID: 1344698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Use of an automated hematology analyzer and flow cytometry to assess bone marrow cellularity and differential cell count.
Kim M; Kim J; Lim J; Kim Y; Han K; Kang CS
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2004; 34(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 15487705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The routine differential leukocyte count vs automated differential counts.
Pierre RV
Blood Cells; 1985; 11(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 4074885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Automated evaluation of synovial and ascitic fluids with the Advia 2120 hematology analyzer.
Froom P; Diab A; Barak M
Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Dec; 140(6):828-30. PubMed ID: 24225750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Analytical evaluation of an automated hematologic analyzer: Cell Dyn 3500].
Sanzari M; De Toni S; D'Osualdo A; Floriani F; Plebani M
Minerva Med; 1996 Mar; 87(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 8668289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis.
Barnes PW; McFadden SL; Machin SJ; Simson E;
Lab Hematol; 2005; 11(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16024331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]