These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25676412)

  • 1. Implementation of equity in resource allocation for regional earthquake risk mitigation using two-stage stochastic programming.
    Zolfaghari MR; Peyghaleh E
    Risk Anal; 2015 Mar; 35(3):434-58. PubMed ID: 25676412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of catastrophe loss modelling to promote property insurance in developing countries.
    Zolfaghari MR
    Disasters; 2010 Apr; 34(2):524-41. PubMed ID: 20002708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mitigation Policy Acceptance Model: An Analysis of Individual Decision Making Process toward Residential Seismic Strengthening.
    Cheng HT; Tsou KW
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Aug; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 30200260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multi-stage stochastic programming approach to epidemic resource allocation with equity considerations.
    Yin X; Büyüktahtakın IE
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2021 Sep; 24(3):597-622. PubMed ID: 33970390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost of equity in homeland security resource allocation in the face of a strategic attacker.
    Shan X; Zhuang J
    Risk Anal; 2013 Jun; 33(6):1083-99. PubMed ID: 23256552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of urban planning guidelines for improving emergency response capacities in seismic areas of Iran.
    Hosseini KA; Jafari MK; Hosseini M; Mansouri B; Hosseinioon S
    Disasters; 2009 Oct; 33(4):645-64. PubMed ID: 19500324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Earthquake Shaking and Damage to Buildings: Recent evidence for severe ground shaking raises questions about the earthquake resistance of structures.
    Page RA; Joyner WB; Blume JA
    Science; 1975 Aug; 189(4203):601-8. PubMed ID: 17838741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The application of seismic risk-benefit analysis to land use planning in Taipei City.
    Hung HC; Chen LC
    Disasters; 2007 Sep; 31(3):256-76. PubMed ID: 17714167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Stochastic Programming Model for Decision-Making Concerning Medical Supply Location and Allocation in Disaster Management.
    Barri Khojasteh S; Macit I
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2017 Dec; 11(6):747-755. PubMed ID: 28580891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporary site selection and decision-making methods: a case study of Tehran, Iran.
    Omidvar B; Baradaran-Shoraka M; Nojavan M
    Disasters; 2013 Jul; 37(3):536-53. PubMed ID: 23647210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for greater Tokyo.
    Stein RS; Toda S; Parsons T; Grunewald E
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2006 Aug; 364(1845):1965-88. PubMed ID: 16844644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prioritising earthquake retrofitting in Wellington, New Zealand.
    Hoang T; Noy I; Filippova O; Elwood K
    Disasters; 2021 Oct; 45(4):968-995. PubMed ID: 32613663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of provincial policies on seismic disaster mitigation in China: An empirical study.
    Gao L; Liu X; Zhao Y; Chen L; Que Y; Wang Z
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(7):e0306867. PubMed ID: 38980890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An exploratory study on perceptions of seismic risk and mitigation in two districts of Istanbul.
    Eraybar K; Okazaki K; Ilki A
    Disasters; 2010 Jan; 34(1):71-92. PubMed ID: 19624701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resource allocation in integrated preoperational and operational management of natural hazards.
    Minciardi R; Sacile R; Trasforini E
    Risk Anal; 2009 Jan; 29(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 19000073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promoting seismic retrofit implementation through "nudge": using warranty as a driver.
    Fujimi T; Tatano H
    Risk Anal; 2013 Oct; 33(10):1858-83. PubMed ID: 23763453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urban earthquake hazard: perceived seismic risk and preparedness in Dhaka City, Bangladesh.
    Paul BK; Bhuiyan RH
    Disasters; 2010 Apr; 34(2):337-59. PubMed ID: 19863568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overview of the critical disaster management challenges faced during Van 2011 earthquakes.
    Tolon M; Yazgan U; Ural DN; Goss KC
    J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 24691918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Earthquake insurance pricing: a risk-based approach.
    Lin JH
    Disasters; 2018 Apr; 42(2):392-404. PubMed ID: 28543429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.