These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25677015)

  • 1. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
    Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
    Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research.
    Chalkidou K; Tunis S; Whicher D; Fowler R; Zwarenstein M
    Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):436-46. PubMed ID: 22752634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An overview of methods for comparative effectiveness research.
    Meyer AM; Wheeler SB; Weinberger M; Chen RC; Carpenter WR
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24314337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observational study designs for comparative effectiveness research: an alternative approach to close evidence gaps in head-and-neck cancer.
    Goulart BH; Ramsey SD; Parvathaneni U
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jan; 88(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 24331656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some methodological points to consider when performing systematic reviews in comparative effectiveness research.
    Berlin JA; Cepeda MS
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 22049086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Applying comparative effectiveness research methods in bipolar disorders.
    McCombs JS; Ganapathy V; Zolfaghari S
    J Affect Disord; 2011 Apr; 130(1-2):145-54. PubMed ID: 20970196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methods of comparative effectiveness research.
    Sox HC; Goodman SN
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2012 Apr; 33():425-45. PubMed ID: 22224891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness research: opportunities in surgical oncology.
    Neuman HB; Greenberg CC
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 24314341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decision support tools to optimize economic outcomes for type 2 diabetes.
    Shaya FT; Chirikov VV
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 Nov; 17 Suppl 14():S377-83. PubMed ID: 22214425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent controversies on comparative effectiveness research investigations: Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls.
    Kirpalani H; Truog WE; D'Angio CT; Cotten M
    Semin Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 40(6):341-347. PubMed ID: 27423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of private industry in pragmatic comparative effectiveness trials.
    Buesching DP; Luce BR; Berger ML
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Mar; 1(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 24237375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quasi-random reflections on randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2012 Feb; 9(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 22334465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effectiveness research: moving medical oncology forward.
    Hirsch BR; Zafar SY
    Semin Radiat Oncol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 24314342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Innovative designs of point-of-care comparative effectiveness trials.
    Shih MC; Turakhia M; Lai TL
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):61-8. PubMed ID: 26099528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Armstrong K
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4208-14. PubMed ID: 23071240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.