These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25677020)

  • 21. Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right.
    Sox HC
    Med Care; 2010 Jun; 48(6 Suppl):S7-8. PubMed ID: 20473202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximizing the clinical utility of comparative effectiveness research.
    Umscheid CA
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2010 Dec; 88(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 20962776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The influence of nursing in head and neck cancer management.
    Kagan SH
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2009 May; 21(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19262382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using observational studies for comparative effectiveness: finding quality with GRACE.
    Dreyer NA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Sep; 2(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 24236736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research.
    Hahn OM; Schilsky RL
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4194-201. PubMed ID: 23071239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.
    Blajchman MA; Carson JL; Eikelboom JW; Heddle NM; Lacroix J; Lauer MS; Platt R; Tilley B; Triulzi D; Vickers AJ; Yusuf S; Glynn S; Mondoro TH; Wagner E
    Transfusion; 2012 Jun; 52(6):1363-78. PubMed ID: 22486525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Oncology training programs: are we doing comparative effectiveness research justice?
    Zaorsky NG; Showalter TN
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Nov; 2(6):573-82. PubMed ID: 24236796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluating methodological assumptions in comparative effectiveness research: overcoming pitfalls.
    Alemayehu D; Cappelleri JC
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):79-93. PubMed ID: 24345258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using comparative effectiveness research to remedy health disparities.
    Kupersmith J; LaBarca D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Mar; 3(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 24645691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Propensity score models in observational comparative effectiveness studies: cornerstone of design or statistical afterthought?
    Robinson JW
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Mar; 1(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 24237373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Approaches to answering critical CER questions.
    Kinnier CV; Chung JW; Bilimoria KY
    Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():1-14. PubMed ID: 25677015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applications of propensity score methods in observational comparative effectiveness and safety research: where have we come and where should we go?
    Borah BJ; Moriarty JP; Crown WH; Doshi JA
    J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):63-78. PubMed ID: 24266593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of administrative data for comparative effectiveness research in the treatment of non-prostate genitourinary malignancies.
    Edwards DC; Cahn DB; Smaldone MC; Kutikov A
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):193-212. PubMed ID: 28867432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Observational methods in comparative effectiveness research.
    Concato J; Lawler EV; Lew RA; Gaziano JM; Aslan M; Huang GD
    Am J Med; 2010 Dec; 123(12 Suppl 1):e16-23. PubMed ID: 21184862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Practical guide to understanding Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).
    Neely JG; Sharon JD; Graboyes EM; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Grindler DJ; Dassopoulos T;
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Dec; 149(6):804-12. PubMed ID: 24098005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research gaps in pancreatic cancer research and comparative effectiveness research methodologies.
    In H; Posner MC
    Cancer Treat Res; 2015; 164():165-94. PubMed ID: 25677024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A structured review and theme analysis of papers published on 'quality of life' in head and neck cancer: 2000-2005.
    Rogers SN; Ahad SA; Murphy AP
    Oral Oncol; 2007 Oct; 43(9):843-68. PubMed ID: 17600755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. PROMIS evaluation for head and neck cancer patients: a comprehensive quality-of-life outcomes assessment tool.
    Stachler RJ; Schultz LR; Nerenz D; Yaremchuk KL
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1368-76. PubMed ID: 24719292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Matching study designs to disability-related comparative effectiveness research questions.
    Ballou J; Rich E; Kehn M
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Jan; 2(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 24236522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.