These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25677094)

  • 1. Fabrication and feasibility study of an absorbable diacetyl chitin surgical suture for wound healing.
    Shao K; Han B; Gao J; Jiang Z; Liu W; Liu W; Liang Y
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2016 Jan; 104(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 25677094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
    Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preparation, Mechanical Properties, and Biocompatibility of Graphene Oxide-Reinforced Chitin Monofilament Absorbable Surgical Sutures.
    Zhang W; Yin B; Xin Y; Li L; Ye G; Wang J; Shen J; Cui X; Yang Q
    Mar Drugs; 2019 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 30987286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fiber from ramie plant (Boehmeria nivea): A novel suture biomaterial.
    Kandimalla R; Kalita S; Choudhury B; Devi D; Kalita D; Kalita K; Dash S; Kotoky J
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 May; 62():816-22. PubMed ID: 26952488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Duration of wound healing and tissue resistance as important criteria for selecting suture materials in colon surgery].
    Lünstedt B; Debus S
    Chirurg; 1990 Oct; 61(10):717-9. PubMed ID: 2276302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Surgical Suture.
    Byrne M; Aly A
    Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Mar; 39(Suppl_2):S67-S72. PubMed ID: 30869751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific basis for the selection of skin closure techniques.
    Edlich RF; Gubler K; Wallis AG; Clark JJ; Dahlstrom JJ; Long WB
    J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol; 2010; 29(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 21284598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of Bacterial Colonization and Clinical Properties of Different Suture Materials in Dentoalveoler Surgery.
    Yaman D; Paksoy T; Ustaoğlu G; Demirci M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Feb; 80(2):313-326. PubMed ID: 34673005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of the Degree of Acetylation of Chitin Nonwoven Fabrics for Promoting Wound Healing.
    He C; Ke M; Zhong Z; Ye Q; He L; Chen Y; Zhou J
    ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2021 Feb; 4(2):1833-1842. PubMed ID: 35014529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of new absorbable Lactomer subcuticular staple.
    Zachmann GC; Foresman PA; Bill TJ; Bentrem DJ; Rodeheaver GT; Edlich RF
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10147448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.
    Zeplin PH; Schmidt K; Laske M; Ziegler UE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 17452845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
    Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
    Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
    Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
    Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology.
    Zaruby J; Gingras K; Taylor J; Maul D
    Aesthet Surg J; 2011 Feb; 31(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 21317121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures.
    Rubin JP; Hunstad JP; Polynice A; Gusenoff JA; Schoeller T; Dunn R; Walgenbach KJ; Hansen JE
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Feb; 34(2):272-83. PubMed ID: 24421408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and colon.
    Hastings JC; Winkle WV; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 May; 140(5):701-7. PubMed ID: 1145404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study.
    Dragovic M; Pejovic M; Stepic J; Colic S; Dozic B; Dragovic S; Lazarevic M; Nikolic N; Milasin J; Milicic B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Apr; 24(4):1527-1541. PubMed ID: 31342245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical suture assembled with polymeric drug-delivery sheet for sustained, local pain relief.
    Lee JE; Park S; Park M; Kim MH; Park CG; Lee SH; Choi SY; Kim BH; Park HJ; Park JH; Heo CY; Choy YB
    Acta Biomater; 2013 Sep; 9(9):8318-27. PubMed ID: 23770220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.