220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25678020)
1. Measurement of subpubic arch angle by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound and impact on vaginal delivery.
Albrich SB; Shek K; Krahn U; Dietz HP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):496-500. PubMed ID: 25678020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significance.
Gilboa Y; Kivilevitch Z; Spira M; Kedem A; Katorza E; Moran O; Achiron R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 23001876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.
Torkildsen EA; Salvesen KÅ; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 21308837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.
Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive value of the trans-perineal three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of the pubic arch angle for vaginal delivery.
Liang ZW; Gao WL
World J Clin Cases; 2023 Jul; 11(20):4874-4882. PubMed ID: 37583997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor.
Tse WT; Chaemsaithong P; Chan WWY; Kwan AHW; Huang J; Appiah K; Chong KC; Poon LC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):335.e1-335.e18. PubMed ID: 31153931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.
Eggebø TM; Hassan WA; Salvesen KÅ; Lindtjørn E; Lees CC
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Feb; 43(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 24105705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode of Delivery in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
Youssef A; Ghi T; Martelli F; Montaguti E; Salsi G; Bellussi F; Pilu G; Rizzo N
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2016; 40(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 26555940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of the angle of progression in the prediction of the outcome of occiput posterior position in the second stage of labor.
Brunelli E; Youssef A; Soliman EM; Del Prete B; Mahmoud MH; Fikry M; Pilu G; Kamel RA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 225(1):81.e1-81.e9. PubMed ID: 33508312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Martelli F; Bellussi F; Aiello E; Pilu G; Rizzo N; Frusca T; Arduini D; Rizzo G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 48(4):511-515. PubMed ID: 26565728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery.
Ghi T; Youssef A; Maroni E; Arcangeli T; De Musso F; Bellussi F; Nanni M; Giorgetta F; Morselli-Labate AM; Iammarino MT; Paccapelo A; Cariello L; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 41(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 23288706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Levator hiatus dimensions in late pregnancy and the process of labor: a 3- and 4-dimensional transperineal ultrasound study.
Siafarikas F; Stær-Jensen J; Hilde G; Bø K; Ellström Engh M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):484.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24569040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.
Ghi T; Maroni E; Youssef A; Morselli-Labate AM; Paccapelo A; Montaguti E; Rizzo N; Pilu G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jul; 44(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 24496823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Descent of fetal head during active pushing: secondary analysis of prospective cohort study investigating ultrasound examination before operative vaginal delivery.
Kahrs BH; Usman S; Ghi T; Youssef A; Torkildsen EA; Lindtjørn E; Østborg TB; Benediktsdottir S; Brooks L; Harmsen L; Salvesen KÅ; Lees CC; Eggebø TM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):524-529. PubMed ID: 31115115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring the angle of the subpubic arch using three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound scan: intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility.
Choi S; Chan SS; Sahota DS; Leung TY
Am J Perinatol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 22875664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Angle of Progression on Ultrasound in the Second Stage of Labor and Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery.
Bibbo C; Rouse CE; Cantonwine DE; Little SE; McElrath TF; Robinson JN
Am J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 35(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 29112996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic prediction of outcome of vacuum deliveries: a multicenter, prospective cohort study.
Kahrs BH; Usman S; Ghi T; Youssef A; Torkildsen EA; Lindtjørn E; Østborg TB; Benediktsdottir S; Brooks L; Harmsen L; Romundstad PR; Salvesen KÅ; Lees CC; Eggebø TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):69.e1-69.e10. PubMed ID: 28327433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between Subpubic Arch Angle and Mode of Delivery in Large-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
Ghi T; Dall'Asta A; Suprani A; Aiello E; Musarò A; Bosi C; Pedrazzi G; Kiener A; Arduini D; Frusca T; Rizzo G
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2018; 44(3):221-227. PubMed ID: 29232667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Time remaining in labor and probability of vaginal delivery as a function of the angle of progression in a low risk population with a normal first stage of labor. In-house observational study and comparison with the data in the literature.
Masturzo B; Piazzese A; Paracchini S; Quezada MS; Todros T; Farina A
Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Feb; 70(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28590104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
