These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25678635)

  • 1. Biotechnology. Agricultural researchers rattled by demands for documents.
    Kloor K
    Science; 2015 Feb; 347(6223):699. PubMed ID: 25678635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Europe angers US with strict GM labeling.
    Mitchell P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):6. PubMed ID: 12511897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Food security: rigorous regulation required.
    Mellon M
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5975):171-2. PubMed ID: 20378799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US and biologists wary of strict biotech rules.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6978):6. PubMed ID: 14999250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divisions sink US consensus effort on transgenic food.
    Knight J
    Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6940):574. PubMed ID: 12789300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Caution: may be harmless if swallowed.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two views of the emperor's new clones.
    Schubert D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Mar; 25(3):282-3. PubMed ID: 17344873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. US agbio controversies continue.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Jul; 17(7):628. PubMed ID: 10409343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Researchers and policymakers are now free to tackle the most-pressing GM issues.
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7611):199. PubMed ID: 27411597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agricultural biotechnology and the UK public.
    Moses V
    Trends Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):402-4. PubMed ID: 12175772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. GM Crops and Food: Biotechnology in Agriculture and the Food Chain. Editorial.
    Moses V; Abdallah NA; Prakash CS
    GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22430849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
    Craddock N
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. European disarray on transgenic crops.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2009 Feb; 457(7232):946. PubMed ID: 19238685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GM-crop opponents expand probe into ties between scientists and industry.
    Kloor K
    Nature; 2015 Aug; 524(7564):145-6. PubMed ID: 26268173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European Parliament vote encourages industry to proclaim green biotech.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):756-7. PubMed ID: 12147985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Room for growth.
    Nature; 2014 Dec; 516(7530):143. PubMed ID: 25503196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.