179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25679153)
1. Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and abdomen-pelvic CT using tube current modulation: a phantom study.
Sabarudin A; Mustafa Z; Nassir KM; Hamid HA; Sun Z
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 16(1):5135. PubMed ID: 25679153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography.
Nawfel RD; Judy PF; Schleipman AR; Silverman SG
Radiology; 2004 Jul; 232(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 15220498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Verification of organ doses calculated by a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in thoracic CT protocols.
Guberina N; Suntharalingam S; Naßenstein K; Forsting M; Theysohn J; Wetter A; Ringelstein A
Acta Radiol; 2018 Mar; 59(3):322-326. PubMed ID: 28618854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient size and radiation exposure in thoracic, pelvic, and abdominal CT examinations performed with automatic exposure control.
Israel GM; Cicchiello L; Brink J; Huda W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):1342-6. PubMed ID: 21098193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating fetal dose from tube current-modulated (TCM) and fixed tube current (FTC) abdominal/pelvis CT examinations.
Hardy AJ; Angel E; Bostani M; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2729-2743. PubMed ID: 30893477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Size-specific Dose Estimates for Chest, Abdominal, and Pelvic CT: Effect of Intrapatient Variability in Water-equivalent Diameter.
Leng S; Shiung M; Duan X; Yu L; Zhang Y; McCollough CH
Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):184-90. PubMed ID: 25734556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparative study of radiation doses between phantom and patients via CT angiography of the intra-/extra-cranial, pulmonary, and abdominal/pelvic arteries.
Karim MKA; Sabarudin A; Muhammad NA; Ng KH
Radiol Phys Technol; 2019 Dec; 12(4):374-381. PubMed ID: 31468370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose from volumetric helical perfusion CT of the thorax, abdomen or pelvis.
Goh V; Dattani M; Farwell J; Shekhdar J; Tam E; Patel S; Juttla J; Simcock I; Stirling J; Mandeville H; Aird E; Hoskin P
Eur Radiol; 2011 May; 21(5):974-81. PubMed ID: 21085968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ABDOMEN-PELVIS COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY PROTOCOL OPTIMIZATION: AN IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE ASSESSMENT.
Pelegrino Bastos Maués NH; Fattori Alves AF; Menegatti Pavan AL; Marrone Ribeiro S; Yamashita S; Petean Trindade A; Mascarenhas YM; Nicolucci P; Rodrigues de Pina D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 30371858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doses metrics and patient age in CT.
Huda W; Tipnis SV
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Mar; 168(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 25977348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variability in Radiation Dose From Repeat Identical CT Examinations: Longitudinal Analysis of 2851 Patients Undergoing 12,635 Thoracoabdominal CT Scans in an Academic Health System.
Mileto A; Nelson RC; Larson DG; Samei E; Wilson JM; Christianson O; Marin D; Boll DT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 28350484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose evaluation and effective dose estimation from multi detector CT.
Nishizawa K; Matsumoto M; Iwai K; Tonari A; Yoshida T; Takayama M
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(3):152-8. PubMed ID: 12766279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of effective and organ dose estimation in CT when using mA modulation: A single scanner pilot study.
Tootell A; Szczepura K; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 May; 23(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.
Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4525-48. PubMed ID: 25069102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PATIENTS DOSE ESTIMATION IN CT EXAMINATIONS USING SIZE SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES.
Choudhary N; Rana BS; Shukla A; Oinam AS; Singh NP; Kumar S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):256-262. PubMed ID: 30496523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Size-specific dose estimates in chest, abdomen, and pelvis CT examinations of pediatric patients.
Özsoykal İ; Yurt A; Akgüngör K
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2018 Jul; 24(4):243-248. PubMed ID: 30091715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
