155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25679158)
1. A comparison of the dose distributions from three proton treatment planning systems in the planning of meningioma patients with single-field uniform dose pencil beam scanning.
Doolan PJ; Alshaikhi J; Rosenberg I; Ainsley CG; Gibson A; D'Souza D; Bentefour el H; Royle G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):4996. PubMed ID: 25679158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose-painting intensity-modulated proton therapy for intermediate- and high-risk meningioma.
Madani I; Lomax AJ; Albertini F; Trnková P; Weber DC
Radiat Oncol; 2015 Mar; 10():72. PubMed ID: 25890217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking of a treatment planning system for spot scanning proton therapy: comparison and analysis of robustness to setup errors of photon IMRT and proton SFUD treatment plans of base of skull meningioma.
Harding R; Trnková P; Weston SJ; Lilley J; Thompson CM; Short SC; Loughrey C; Cosgrove VP; Lomax AJ; Thwaites DI
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111710. PubMed ID: 25370624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric comparison of protons vs photons in re-irradiation of intracranial meningioma.
Poel R; Stuessi Lobmaier A; Andratschke N; Unkelbach J; Tanadini-Lang S; Guckenberger M; Foerster R
Br J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 92(1100):20190113. PubMed ID: 31264474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dose conformation of intensity-modulated stereotactic photon beams, proton beams, and intensity-modulated proton beams for intracranial lesions.
Baumert BG; Norton IA; Lomax AJ; Davis JB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1314-24. PubMed ID: 15519805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of
Stade F; Dittmar JO; Jäkel O; Kratochwil C; Haberkorn U; Debus J; Combs SE
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 13(1):58. PubMed ID: 29606149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of prostate proton treatment planning technique, interfraction robustness, and analysis of single-field treatment feasibility.
Kirk ML; Tang S; Zhai H; Vapiwala N; Deville C; James P; Bekelman JE; Christodouleas JP; Tochner Z; Both S
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 25413411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison.
Tessonnier T; Mairani A; Chen W; Sala P; Cerutti F; Ferrari A; Haberer T; Debus J; Parodi K
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Jan; 13(1):2. PubMed ID: 29316969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Range optimization for mono- and bi-energetic proton modulated arc therapy with pencil beam scanning.
Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Kirk M; Fager M; Burgdorf B; Stowe M; Solberg T; Carabe A
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(21):N565-N574. PubMed ID: 27740944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of varying planning parameters on proton pencil beam scanning dose distributions in four commercial treatment planning systems.
Alshaikhi J; Doolan PJ; D'Souza D; Holloway SM; Amos RA; Royle G
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1150-1162. PubMed ID: 30632173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it beneficial to use apertures in proton radiosurgery with a scanning beam? A dosimetric comparison in neurinoma and meningioma patients.
Righetto R; Fellin F; Scartoni D; Amichetti M; Schwarz M; Amelio D; Farace P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13459. PubMed ID: 34751499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT) using fixed beams or an ion gantry for the treatment of patients with skull base meningiomas.
Kosaki K; Ecker S; Habermehl D; Rieken S; Jäkel O; Herfarth K; Debus J; Combs SE
Radiat Oncol; 2012 Mar; 7():44. PubMed ID: 22439607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes.
Kralik JC; Xi L; Solberg TD; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):41-50. PubMed ID: 26699553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Projected second tumor risk and dose to neurocognitive structures after proton versus photon radiotherapy for benign meningioma.
Arvold ND; Niemierko A; Broussard GP; Adams J; Fullerton B; Loeffler JS; Shih HA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jul; 83(4):e495-500. PubMed ID: 22285662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of improved organ at risk sparing for meningioma: light ion beam therapy as boost versus sole treatment option.
Mock U; Georg D; Sölkner L; Suppan C; Vatnitsky SM; Flechl B; Mayer R; Dieckmann K; Knäusl B
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Jun; 111(3):451-6. PubMed ID: 25012644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limitations of analytical dose calculations for small field proton radiosurgery.
Geng C; Daartz J; Lam-Tin-Cheung K; Bussiere M; Shih HA; Paganetti H; Schuemann J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):246-257. PubMed ID: 27991438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]