These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25679796)

  • 1. I "hear" what you're "saying": Auditory perceptual simulation, reading speed, and reading comprehension.
    Zhou P; Christianson K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):972-95. PubMed ID: 25679796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory perceptual simulation: Simulating speech rates or accents?
    Zhou P; Christianson K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jul; 168():85-90. PubMed ID: 27177077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex.
    Yao B; Belin P; Scheepers C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3146-52. PubMed ID: 21452944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Background Speech Effects on Sentence Processing during Reading: An Eye Movement Study.
    Hyönä J; Ekholm M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0152133. PubMed ID: 27003410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is imagining a voice like listening to it? Evidence from ERPs.
    Zhou P; Garnsey S; Christianson K
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():227-241. PubMed ID: 30366220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. I see what you're saying: the integration of complex speech and scenes during language comprehension.
    Andersson R; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jun; 137(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 21303711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does mood influence text processing and comprehension? Evidence from an eye-movement study.
    Scrimin S; Mason L
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2015 Sep; 85(3):387-406. PubMed ID: 26010020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension.
    Foucart A; Garcia X; Ayguasanosa M; Thierry G; Martin C; Costa A
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():291-303. PubMed ID: 26115602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
    Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or.
    Staub A; Clifton C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):425-36. PubMed ID: 16569157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension.
    Kentner G
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 22217385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensitivity to speaker control in the online comprehension of conditional tips and promises: an eye-tracking study.
    Stewart AJ; Haigh M; Ferguson HJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1022-36. PubMed ID: 23356237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. So Much to Read, So Little Time: How Do We Read, and Can Speed Reading Help?
    Rayner K; Schotter ER; Masson ME; Potter MC; Treiman R
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2016 May; 17(1):4-34. PubMed ID: 26769745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modulation of scene consistency and task demand on language-driven eye movements for audio-visual integration.
    Yu WY; Tsai JL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():1-16. PubMed ID: 27640139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An eye-tracking investigation into readers' sensitivity to actual versus expected utility in the comprehension of conditionals.
    Haigh M; Ferguson HJ; Stewart AJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):166-85. PubMed ID: 23710889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.