BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25679983)

  • 1. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stereo viewing modulates three-dimensional shape processing during object recognition: A high-density ERP study.
    Oliver ZJ; Cristino F; Roberts MV; Pegna AJ; Leek EC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Apr; 44(4):518-534. PubMed ID: 29022728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A stereo advantage in generalizing over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks.
    Bennett DJ; Vuong QC
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1082-93. PubMed ID: 17355033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available.
    Lee YL; Saunders JA
    J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 21849629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
    Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognizing rotated views of objects: interpolation versus generalization by humans and pigeons.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 12747500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Owls see in stereo much like humans do.
    van der Willigen RF
    J Vis; 2011 Jun; 11(7):10. PubMed ID: 21665984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symmetry facilitates shape constancy for smoothly curved 3D objects.
    Lee YL; Saunders JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1193-204. PubMed ID: 23276112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects.
    Balas BJ; Sinha P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):712-23. PubMed ID: 19429954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition.
    Hill H; Schyns PG; Akamatsu S
    Cognition; 1997 Feb; 62(2):201-22. PubMed ID: 9141907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stereoscopic disparity on early ERP components during classification of three-dimensional objects.
    Pegna AJ; Darque A; Roberts MV; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1419-1430. PubMed ID: 28524772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rotation direction affects object recognition.
    Vuong QC; Tarr MJ
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(14):1717-30. PubMed ID: 15136006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural substrates of view-invariant object recognition developed without experiencing rotations of the objects.
    Okamura JY; Yamaguchi R; Honda K; Wang G; Tanaka K
    J Neurosci; 2014 Nov; 34(45):15047-59. PubMed ID: 25378169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Object recognition under sequential viewing conditions: evidence for viewpoint-specific recognition procedures.
    Lawson R; Humphreys GW; Watson DG
    Perception; 1994; 23(5):595-614. PubMed ID: 7800472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating the effects of angular disparity and image similarity in mental rotation and object recognition.
    Cheung OS; Hayward WG; Gauthier I
    Cognition; 2009 Oct; 113(1):128-33. PubMed ID: 19665109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic visual information facilitates object recognition from novel viewpoints.
    Teramoto W; Riecke BE
    J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(13):11. PubMed ID: 21075836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ocular prevalence: difference between crossed and uncrossed disparities of stereo objects.
    Jaschinski W; Schroth V
    Strabismus; 2008; 16(4):159-64. PubMed ID: 19089761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of distinctive parts on recognition of depth-rotated objects by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans.
    Spetch ML; Friedman A; Reid SL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2001 Jun; 130(2):238-55. PubMed ID: 11409102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects.
    Kourtzi Z; Shiffrar M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1999 Sep; 102(2-3):265-92. PubMed ID: 10504884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of surface-based representations of shape in visual object recognition.
    Reppa I; Greville WJ; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2351-69. PubMed ID: 25768675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.