232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25680001)
1. A study of usability principles and interface design for mobile e-books.
Wang CM; Huang CH
Ergonomics; 2015; 58(8):1253-65. PubMed ID: 25680001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing the user interface of a data entry module for an electronic patient record for cardiac rehabilitation: A mixed method usability approach.
van Engen-Verheul MM; Peute LW; de Keizer NF; Peek N; Jaspers MW
Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():15-26. PubMed ID: 26806708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of protoype medium on usability testing.
Boothe C; Strawderman L; Hosea E
Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 23668779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Geospatial assistive technologies for wheelchair users: a scoping review of usability measures and criteria for mobile user interfaces and their potential applicability.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA; Routhier F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):119-131. PubMed ID: 30663444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Usability Methods and Attributes Reported in Usability Studies of Mobile Apps for Health Care Education: Scoping Review.
Johnson SG; Potrebny T; Larun L; Ciliska D; Olsen NR
JMIR Med Educ; 2022 Jun; 8(2):e38259. PubMed ID: 35767323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users' characteristics.
Rangraz Jeddi F; Nabovati E; Bigham R; Khajouei R
Int J Med Inform; 2020 Jan; 133():104026. PubMed ID: 31733603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.
Prémont MÉ; Vincent C; Mostafavi MA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Nov; 15(8):844-855. PubMed ID: 31226889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A usability study of users' perceptions toward a multimedia computer-assisted learning tool for neuroanatomy.
Gould DJ; Terrell MA; Fleming J
Anat Sci Educ; 2008; 1(4):175-83. PubMed ID: 19177405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usability assessment of pacemaker programmers.
Chiu CC; Vicente KJ; Buffo-Sequeira I; Hamilton RM; McCrindle BW
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 27(10):1388-98. PubMed ID: 15511248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usability Challenges for Health and Wellness Mobile Apps: Mixed-Methods Study Among mHealth Experts and Consumers.
Liew MS; Zhang J; See J; Ong YL
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jan; 7(1):e12160. PubMed ID: 30698528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. User-centred web design, usability and user satisfaction: The case of online banking websites in Iran.
Dianat I; Adeli P; Asgari Jafarabadi M; Karimi MA
Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102892. PubMed ID: 31422242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mobile health application for Thai women: investigation and model.
Kongjit C; Nimmolrat A; Khamaksorn A
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 Jul; 22(1):202. PubMed ID: 35907950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Mixed-Methods Study of Users' Journey Mapping Experience and Acceptance of Telehealthcare Technology in Taiwan.
Tsung-Yin O; Chih-Young H; Che-Wei L
Telemed J E Health; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1057-1070. PubMed ID: 30694730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Smartphone app aesthetics influence users' experience and performance.
Perrig SAC; Ueffing D; Opwis K; Brühlmann F
Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1113842. PubMed ID: 37388645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. User Experience of the Mobile Terminal Customization System: The Influence of Interface Design and Educational Background on Personalized Customization.
Yi M; Wang Y; Tian X; Xia H
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33915995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and usability evaluation of user-centered and visual-based aids for dietary food measurement on mobile devices in a randomized controlled trial.
Liu YC; Chen CH; Lee CW; Lin YS; Chen HY; Yeh JY; Chiu SY
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Dec; 64():122-130. PubMed ID: 27720984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding the usability issues in contact management of illiterate and semi-literate users.
Hayat S; Rextin A; Bilal A
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0259719. PubMed ID: 34855755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What do users think of the UK's three COVID-19 contact-tracing apps? A comparative analysis.
Garousi V; Cutting D
BMJ Health Care Inform; 2021 Jul; 28(1):. PubMed ID: 34281994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usability evaluation of selected picture archiving and communication systems at the national level: Analysis of users' viewpoints.
Farzandipour M; Sadeqi Jabali M; Nickfarjam AM; Tadayon H
Int J Med Inform; 2021 Mar; 147():104372. PubMed ID: 33421687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnant Users' Perceptions of the Birth Plan Interface in the "My Prenatal Care" App: Observational Validation Study.
Moraes Carrilho J; Oliveira IJR; Santos D; Osanan GC; Cruz-Correia RJ; Reis ZSN
JMIR Form Res; 2019 Mar; 3(1):e11374. PubMed ID: 30920372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
