167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25680361)
1. Effect of quality of bowel preparation on quality indicators of adenoma detection rates and colonoscopy completion rates.
Rai T; Navaneethan U; Gohel T; Podugu A; Thota PN; Kiran RP; Lopez R; Sanaka MR
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2016 May; 4(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 25680361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.
Clark BT; Rustagi T; Laine L
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. PubMed ID: 25135006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Excellent Bowel Preparation Quality Is Not Superior to Good Bowel Preparation Quality for Improving Adenoma/Polyp Detection Rate.
Li Y; Meng F; Cao R; Gao C; Su D; Wang K; Han J; Qi X
Clin Med Insights Oncol; 2024; 18():11795549241229190. PubMed ID: 38332773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy.
Wadhwa V; Jobanputra Y; Al Taii H; Thota PN; Lopez R; Gurudu SR; Sanaka MR
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 30927122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adenoma detection in excellent versus good bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
Tholey DM; Shelton CE; Francis G; Anantharaman A; Frankel RA; Shah P; Coan A; Hegarty SE; Leiby BE; Kastenberg DM
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Apr; 49(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 25494362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Water Immersion Versus Air Insufflation Colonoscopy Under Various Bowel Preparation Conditions.
Niu S; Yang Y; Shang G; Chen Y; Ma Z; Wu F; Zhang H
Turk J Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 32(2):209-217. PubMed ID: 33960946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rates of Suboptimal Preparation for Colonoscopy Differ Markedly Between Providers: Impact on Adenoma Detection Rates.
Mahadev S; Green PH; Lebwohl B
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 49(9):746-50. PubMed ID: 25144900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality indicators for colonoscopy in a Tunisian endoscopy unit.
Ennaifer R; Elleuch N; Sabbagh S; Romdhane H; Hefaiedh R; Ben Nejma H; Belhadj N
Tunis Med; 2015 Mar; 93(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 26367400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Significantly Impairs Colonoscopic Detection of Non-polypoid Colorectal Neoplasms.
Oh CH; Lee CK; Kim JW; Shim JJ; Jang JY
Dig Dis Sci; 2015 Aug; 60(8):2294-303. PubMed ID: 25777260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of glycemic control on colonoscopy outcomes: bowel preparation and polyp detection.
Izzy M; Changela K; Alhankawi D; Haeri NS; Shah S; Jibara G; Anand S; Singhal S
Ann Gastroenterol; 2016; 29(3):332-5. PubMed ID: 27366034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The benefit of adding oral simethicone in bowel preparation regimen for the detection of colon adenoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yeh JH; Hsu MH; Tseng CM; Chen TH; Huang RY; Lee CT; Lin CW; Wang WL
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 May; 34(5):830-836. PubMed ID: 30311262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A low-volume polyethylene glycol solution was associated with an increased suboptimal bowel preparation rate but had similar recommendations for an early repeat colonoscopy, procedure times, and adenoma detection rates.
Hankins SC; Brimhall BB; Kankanala V; Austin GL
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176265. PubMed ID: 28448598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between adenoma detection rate and novel quality indicators for screening colonoscopy. A proposal for quality measures tool kit.
Abdelfatah MM; Elhanafi S; Zuckerman MJ; Othman MO
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2017 Oct; 52(10):1148-1157. PubMed ID: 28643529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality of colonoscopy performed by medical or surgical specialists and trainees in five Australian hospitals.
Ow TW; Sukocheva OA; Tran V; Lin R; Lee SZ; Chu M; Angelica B; Rayner CK; Tse E; Iyngkaran G; Bampton PA
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Nov; 14(11):672-683. PubMed ID: 36438878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morning colonoscopies are associated with improved adenoma detection rates.
Teng TY; Khor SN; Kailasam M; Cheah WK; Lau CC
Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1796-803. PubMed ID: 26198158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Colonoscopy Insertion Techniques on Adenoma Detection.
Cadoni S; Falt P; Sanna S; Argiolas M; Fanari V; Gallittu P; Liggi M; Mura D; Porcedda ML; Smajstrla V; Erriu M; Leung FW
Dig Dis Sci; 2016 Jul; 61(7):2068-75. PubMed ID: 26846118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of bowel preparation on surveillance colonoscopy interval.
Singhal S; Virk MA; Momeni M; Krishnaiah M; Anand S
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):885-90. PubMed ID: 24902032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
