These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2568038)

  • 21. [Perception of musical stimuli by the dichotic listening test--studies on primary school girls of the chorus group].
    Tasaki H; Watanabe S; Hojo K; Sato T
    No To Shinkei; 1983 Jun; 35(6):611-8. PubMed ID: 6626383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH; Lenarz T; Joseph G; Battmer RD; Patrick JF; Lenarz M
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Ipsilateral loudness adaptation over multiple intensity levels.
    Weiler EM; Sandman DE; Janson-Pinto J; Dange AJ; Dember WN; Warm JS; Nelson WT
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Oct; 127(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 11109999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Right hemisphere specialization for intensity discrimination of musical and speech sounds.
    Brancucci A; Babiloni C; Rossini PM; Romani GL
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(13):1916-23. PubMed ID: 16168732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interaural correlation and the binaural summation of loudness.
    Edmonds BA; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3865-70. PubMed ID: 19507969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Recovery following induced adaptation to sound].
    Scharf B; Botte MC; Canévet G
    Annee Psychol; 1983; 83(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 6614883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Binaural summation after learning psychophysical functions for loudness.
    Marks LE; Galanter E; Baird JC
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1209-16. PubMed ID: 8539096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Sequence effects in absolute judgment? Critical comments on the method].
    Haubensak G
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1992; 39(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 1598762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Binaural summation and lateralization of transients: a combined analysis.
    Algom D; Adam R; Cohen-Raz L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1302-15. PubMed ID: 3198865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Aftereffect arising from unidirectional change of sound level in a tone: frequency specificity with a complex adaptor.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Apr; 117(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 2366051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A shorter version of the Weiler-Hood model for loudness coding during adaptation.
    Alleman H; Weiler EM
    J Aud Res; 1978 Apr; 18(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 753827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Further test of a model for loudness coding after adaptation.
    Mahon AE; Weiler EM
    Br J Audiol; 1980 Feb; 14(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 7362920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sensory and cognitive factors in judgments of loudness.
    Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):426-43. PubMed ID: 528950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tonal adaptation.
    Barratt H; Hood JD
    Br J Audiol; 1984 Nov; 18(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 6525471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Heterophonic auditory adaptation to critical and noncritical bandwidths.
    Cole-Glass EB; Weiler EM; Kretschmer LW; Agnello JG
    Audiology; 1981; 20(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 7213206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of onset sound level of test stimulus on reported magnitude of changing-loudness aftereffects.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    J Gen Psychol; 1995 Jul; 122(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 7650523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A principal components model of soundscape perception.
    Axelsson Ö; Nilsson ME; Berglund B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):2836-46. PubMed ID: 21110579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.