These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

652 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25680936)

  • 21. Role of sacral neuromodulation in modern urogynaecology practice: a review of recent literature.
    Tahseen S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1081-1091. PubMed ID: 29302716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A Supervised 3 Weeks Test Phase in Sacral Neuromodulation with a 1-Year Followup.
    Tilborghs S; Van de Borne S; Vaganée D; De Win G; De Wachter S
    J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):206-212. PubMed ID: 32716692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimal Lead Positioning in Sacral Neuromodulation: Which Factors Are Related to Treatment Outcome?
    Jairam R; Marcelissen T; van Koeveringe G; van Kerrebroeck P
    Neuromodulation; 2017 Dec; 20(8):830-835. PubMed ID: 28877395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Sacral neuromodulation as second-line treatment strategy for lower urinary tract symptoms of various aetiologies: experience of a German high-volume clinic].
    Otto W; Nowrotek A; Burger M; Wieland WF; Rößler W; Denzinger S
    Aktuelle Urol; 2012 May; 43(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 22639025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intravesical electrostimulation versus sacral neuromodulation for incomplete spinal cord patients suffering from neurogenic non-obstructive urinary retention.
    Lombardi G; Musco S; Celso M; Ierardi A; Nelli F; Del Corso F; Del Popolo G
    Spinal Cord; 2013 Jul; 51(7):571-8. PubMed ID: 23628893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prolonged percutaneous SNM testing does not cause infection-related explanation.
    Amend B; Bedke J; Khalil M; Stenzl A; Sievert KD
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 22738331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sacral neuromodulation in urological indications: the Finnish experience.
    Vaarala MH; Tammela TL; Perttilä I; Luukkonen P; Hellström P
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Feb; 45(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 20961268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of pulse rate changes on the clinical outcome of sacral neuromodulation.
    Marcelissen TA; Leong RK; Nieman FH; de Bie RA; van Kerrebroeck PE; de Wachter SG
    J Urol; 2011 May; 185(5):1781-5. PubMed ID: 21420118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An overview of sacral neuromodulation: a treatment for patients with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction.
    Fletcher N
    Br J Nurs; 2020 Aug; 29(15):848-856. PubMed ID: 32790556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Sacral neuromodulation in patients with nonobstructive, chronic urinary retention: relevance of the carbachol test and influence of associated nerve lession].
    Bross S; Braun PM; Weiss J; Martinez Portillo FJ; Knoll T; Seif C; Jünemann KP; Alken P
    Aktuelle Urol; 2003 May; 34(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 14566686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outcomes in a contemporary cohort undergoing sacral neuromodulation using optimized lead placement technique.
    Adelstein SA; Lee W; Gioia K; Moskowitz D; Stamnes K; Lucioni A; Kobashi KC; Lee UJ
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Aug; 38(6):1595-1601. PubMed ID: 31044466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Differentiation of lower urinary tract dysfunctions: The role of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring.
    Rademakers KL; Drossaerts JM; Rahnama'i MS; van Koeveringe GA
    Int J Urol; 2015 May; 22(5):503-7. PubMed ID: 25711671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Urodynamic study of women in urinary retention treated with sacral neuromodulation.
    DasGupta R; Fowler CJ
    J Urol; 2004 Mar; 171(3):1161-4. PubMed ID: 14767292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sacral neuromodulation treatment for urinary voiding dysfunctions: results of treatment with the largest single-center series in a tertiary referral center in Turkey.
    Kütükoğlu MU; Altuntaş T; Şahin B; Onur AR
    Turk J Med Sci; 2023 Feb; 53(1):206-210. PubMed ID: 36945940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Urethral instability and sacral nerve stimulation-a better parameter to predict efficacy?
    Groenendijk PM; Heesakkers JP; Lycklama A Nijeholt AA
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):568-72; discussion 572. PubMed ID: 17570438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early sacral neuromodulation ameliorates urinary bladder function and structure in complete spinal cord injury minipigs.
    Keller EE; Patras I; Hutu I; Roider K; Sievert KD; Aigner L; Janetschek G; Lusuardi L; Zimmermann R; Bauer S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Feb; 39(2):586-593. PubMed ID: 31868966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Results of a prospective, multicenter study evaluating quality of life, safety, and efficacy of sacral neuromodulation at twelve months in subjects with symptoms of overactive bladder.
    Noblett K; Siegel S; Mangel J; Griebling TL; Sutherland SE; Bird ET; Comiter C; Culkin D; Bennett J; Zylstra S; Kan F; Berg KC
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Feb; 35(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 25546568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Urinary symptoms and urodynamic findings in women with pelvic organ prolapse: is there a correlation? Results of an artificial neural network analysis.
    Serati M; Salvatore S; Siesto G; Cattoni E; Braga A; Sorice P; Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Bolis P
    Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 21420230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The long-term efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in the management of intractable cases of bladder pain syndrome: 14 years of experience in one centre.
    Gajewski JB; Al-Zahrani AA
    BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107(8):1258-64. PubMed ID: 20883483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Urodynamic changes and response rates in patients treated with permanent electrodes compared to conventional wire electrodes in the peripheral nerve evaluation test.
    Bannowsky A; Wefer B; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
    World J Urol; 2008 Dec; 26(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 18629503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.