305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25681251)
1. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis.
Cui X; Ji F; Yan H; Ou TW; Jia CS; He XZ; Gao W; Wang Q; Cui B; Wu JT
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):748-56. PubMed ID: 25681251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ten-year experience in the management of distal ureteral stones greater than 10 mm in size.
Dell'Atti L; Papa S
G Chir; 2016; 37(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 27142822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis.
Yang C; Li S; Cui Y
Urol Int; 2017; 98(4):373-381. PubMed ID: 27798945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies.
Arcaniolo D; De Sio M; Rassweiler J; Nicholas J; Lima E; Carrieri G; Liatsikos E; Mirone V; Monga M; Autorino R
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):563-572. PubMed ID: 28233025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteral stones. A comparative study].
Xue ZY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Apr; 29(4):235-7, 271. PubMed ID: 1874112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of effectiveness and complications.
Zhong W; Zeng G; Cai Y; Dai Q; Hu J; Wei H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jul; 116(7):1001-3. PubMed ID: 12890371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.
Wu CF; Chen CS; Lin WY; Shee JJ; Lin CL; Chen Y; Huang WS
Urology; 2005 Jun; 65(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 15893812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Lam JS; Greene TD; Gupta M
J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):1972-6. PubMed ID: 11956420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
Aboumarzouk OM; Kata SG; Keeley FX; Nabi G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Dec; (12):CD006029. PubMed ID: 22161396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of Proximal Ureteric Stones: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) Versus Ureterorenoscopic Lithotripsy (URSL).
Joshi HN; Shrestha B; Karmacharya RM; Makaju S; Koju R; Gyawali D
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2017 Oct.-Dec.; 15(60):343-346. PubMed ID: 30580354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.
Aboumarzouk OM; Kata SG; Keeley FX; McClinton S; Nabi G
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 May; (5):CD006029. PubMed ID: 22592707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.
Parker BD; Frederick RW; Reilly TP; Lowry PS; Bird ET
Urology; 2004 Dec; 64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. PubMed ID: 15596177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral stones: only an auxiliary measure of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or a primary therapeutic option?
Osti AH; Hofmockel G; Frohmüller H
Urol Int; 1997; 59(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 9428436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
