399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25681352)
1. Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques.
Reyes A; Turkyilmaz I; Prihoda TJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 25681352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereoscopic technique for conversion of radiographic guide into implant surgical guide.
Chan PW; Chik FF; Pow EH; Chow TW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 21985642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guide with a handpiece guidance apparatus: a case report.
Ozan O; Seker E; Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ersoy AE
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 21767212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique.
Zhao XZ; Xu WH; Tang ZH; Wu MJ; Zhu J; Chen S
Chin J Dent Res; 2014; 17(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 25028687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of three different types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: an in vitro study.
Turbush SK; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 22944314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of chairside-milled CAD/CAM drill guides for dental implants.
Ritter L; Palmer J; Bindl A; Irsen S; Cizek J; Karapetian VE; Zöller JE
Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):115-24. PubMed ID: 25098159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Split-mouth comparison of the accuracy of computer-generated and conventional surgical guides.
Farley NE; Kennedy K; McGlumphy EA; Clelland NL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):563-72. PubMed ID: 23527361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery on plastic models.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1472-8. PubMed ID: 24993374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Karl M; Graef F; Wichmann M; Krafft T
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Apr; 107(4):232-8. PubMed ID: 22475466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide.
Sarment DP; Sukovic P; Clinthorne N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):571-7. PubMed ID: 12939011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of implant surgical guides based on soft-tissue models.
Maney P; Simmons DE; Palaiologou A; Kee E
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Dec; 38(6):723-7. PubMed ID: 23317298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study.
Alshawaf B; Weber HP; Finkelman M; El Rafie K; Kudara Y; Papaspyridakos P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Aug; 29(8):835-842. PubMed ID: 29926977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intaglio Surface Dimension and Guide Tube Deviations of Implant Surgical Guides Influenced by Printing Layer Thickness and Angulation Setting.
Dalal N; Ammoun R; Abdulmajeed AA; Deeb GR; Bencharit S
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):161-165. PubMed ID: 31886914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models.
Bae MJ; Kim JY; Park JT; Cha JY; Kim HJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 23726340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
