219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25683219)
1. Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging in simultaneously examining muscle size and quality of the hamstring muscles in young, healthy males and females.
Palmer TB; Akehi K; Thiele RM; Smith DB; Thompson BJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 41(3):675-84. PubMed ID: 25683219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of panoramic ultrasound imaging to simultaneously examine muscle size and quality of the medial gastrocnemius.
Rosenberg JG; Ryan ED; Sobolewski EJ; Scharville MJ; Thompson BJ; King GE
Muscle Nerve; 2014 May; 49(5):736-40. PubMed ID: 24038069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Test-Retest Reliability of Single Transverse versus Panoramic Ultrasound Imaging for Muscle Size and Echo Intensity of the Biceps Brachii.
Jenkins ND; Miller JM; Buckner SL; Cochrane KC; Bergstrom HC; Hill EC; Smith CM; Housh TJ; Cramer JT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):1584-91. PubMed ID: 25746907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound assessment of hamstring muscle size using posterior thigh muscle thickness.
Abe T; Loenneke JP; Thiebaud RS
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2016 May; 36(3):206-10. PubMed ID: 25363847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of panoramic ultrasound for muscle quantification.
Scott JM; Martin DS; Ploutz-Snyder R; Caine T; Matz T; Arzeno NM; Buxton R; Ploutz-Snyder L
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Sep; 38(9):1656-61. PubMed ID: 22749820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of ultrasound-derived muscle thickness and echo-intensity for the entire quadriceps femoris muscle.
Santos R; Armada-da-Silva PAS
Radiography (Lond); 2017 Aug; 23(3):e51-e61. PubMed ID: 28687301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability of Distal Hamstring Tendon Length and Cross-sectional Area Using 3-D Freehand Ultrasound.
Sahinis C; Kellis E; Dafkou K; Ellinoudis A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 47(9):2579-2588. PubMed ID: 34246531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of size and echo intensity of abdominal skeletal muscles using extended field-of-view ultrasound imaging.
Tanaka NI; Ogawa M; Yoshiko A; Ando R; Akima H
Eur J Appl Physiol; 2017 Nov; 117(11):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 28913554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and Validity of Ultrasonography for Measurement of Hamstring Muscle and Tendon Cross-Sectional Area.
Kositsky A; Gonçalves BAM; Stenroth L; Barrett RS; Diamond LE; Saxby DJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 46(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 31668942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Muscle echo intensity: reliability and conditioning factors.
Caresio C; Molinari F; Emanuel G; Minetto MA
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2015 Sep; 35(5):393-403. PubMed ID: 24902991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Panoramic Ultrasound Examination of Posterior Neck Extensors in Healthy Subjects: Intra-Examiner Reliability Study.
Valera-Calero JA; Gallego-Sendarrubias GM; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; Cleland JA; Ortega-Santiago R; Arias-Buría JL
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 32987741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantity and Quality of the Lower Extremity Muscles in Women with Knee Osteoarthritis.
Taniguchi M; Fukumoto Y; Kobayashi M; Kawasaki T; Maegawa S; Ibuki S; Ichihashi N
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2567-74. PubMed ID: 26099784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of architectural properties of the hamstring muscles: correlation of ultrasound findings with cadaveric dissection.
Kellis E; Galanis N; Natsis K; Kapetanos G
J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2549-54. PubMed ID: 19646698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-sectional areas of fat and muscle in limbs during growth and middle age.
Kanehisa H; Ikegawa S; Tsunoda N; Fukunaga T
Int J Sports Med; 1994 Oct; 15(7):420-5. PubMed ID: 8002122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association between echo intensity and attenuation of skeletal muscle in young and older adults: a comparison between ultrasonography and computed tomography.
Watanabe Y; Ikenaga M; Yoshimura E; Yamada Y; Kimura M
Clin Interv Aging; 2018; 13():1871-1878. PubMed ID: 30323573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between ultrasound muscle thickness and MRI-measured muscle cross-sectional area in the forearm: a pilot study.
Abe T; Nakatani M; Loenneke JP
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Jul; 38(4):652-655. PubMed ID: 28795485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Echo-intensity and fatty infiltration ultrasound imaging measurement of cervical multifidus and short rotators in healthy people: A reliability study.
Valera-Calero JA; Arias-Buría JL; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C; Cleland JA; Gallego-Sendarrubias GM; Cimadevilla-Fernández-Pola E
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2021 Jun; 53():102335. PubMed ID: 33531271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skeletal muscle analysis of panoramic ultrasound is reliable across multiple raters.
Cleary CJ; Nabavizadeh O; Young KL; Herda AA
PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0267641. PubMed ID: 35500010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative ultrasound of lower leg and foot muscles: feasibility and reference values.
Verhulst FV; Leeuwesteijn AE; Louwerens JW; Geurts AC; Van Alfen N; Pillen S
Foot Ankle Surg; 2011 Sep; 17(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 21783075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Panoramic ultrasound: a novel and valid tool for monitoring change in muscle mass.
Scott JM; Martin DS; Ploutz-Snyder R; Matz T; Caine T; Downs M; Hackney K; Buxton R; Ryder JW; Ploutz-Snyder L
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle; 2017 Jun; 8(3):475-481. PubMed ID: 28052593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]