BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25683369)

  • 1. The connecticut experiments second year: ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
    Weigert J; Steenbergen S
    Breast J; 2015; 21(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 25683369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Connecticut Experiment; The Third Installment: 4 Years of Screening Women with Dense Breasts with Bilateral Ultrasound.
    Weigert JM
    Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):34-39. PubMed ID: 27647744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts.
    Weigert J; Steenbergen S
    Breast J; 2012; 18(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 23009208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.
    Okello J; Kisembo H; Bugeza S; Galukande M
    BMC Med Imaging; 2014 Dec; 14():41. PubMed ID: 25547239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458.
    Parris T; Wakefield D; Frimmer H
    Breast J; 2013; 19(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23240937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
    Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
    Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center.
    Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New York State Breast Density Mandate: Follow-up Data With Screening Sonography.
    Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Dec; 36(12):2511-2517. PubMed ID: 28656638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
    Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
    Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
    Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
    Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasound screening of contralateral breast after surgery for breast cancer.
    Kim SJ; Chung SY; Chang JM; Cho N; Han W; Moon WK
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25458226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Mammography and Mammography with Supplemental Whole-Breast US Tomography for Cancer Detection in Patients with Dense Breasts.
    Yamashita MW; Larsen LH; Perez J; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Jiang Y
    Radiology; 2024 Jun; 311(3):e231680. PubMed ID: 38888480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breasts: Reader Study of Mammography-Negative and Mammography-Positive Cancers.
    Giger ML; Inciardi MF; Edwards A; Papaioannou J; Drukker K; Jiang Y; Brem R; Brown JB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jun; 206(6):1341-50. PubMed ID: 27043979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening of Women With Extremely Dense Breasts to Reduce False-Positive Diagnoses.
    Verburg E; van Gils CH; Bakker MF; Viergever MA; Pijnappel RM; Veldhuis WB; Gilhuijs KGA
    Invest Radiol; 2020 Jul; 55(7):438-444. PubMed ID: 32149858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.