These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25683548)

  • 1. Age-related differences in processing visual device and task characteristics when using technical devices.
    Oehl M; Sutter C
    Appl Ergon; 2015 May; 48():214-23. PubMed ID: 25683548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pointing Device Performance in Steering Tasks.
    Senanayake R; Goonetilleke RS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Jun; 122(3):886-910. PubMed ID: 27216944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of mouse and one- and two-finger input methods for searching a large, horizontal display.
    Hsu CC; Huang HG
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Oct; 113(2):686-702. PubMed ID: 22185083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Touch a screen or turn a knob: choosing the best device for the job.
    Rogers WA; Fisk AD; McLaughlin AC; Pak R
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(2):271-88. PubMed ID: 16170938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance study on touch-pens size in three screen tasks.
    Wu FG; Luo S
    Appl Ergon; 2006 Mar; 37(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 16153590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment.
    Baldus T; Patterson P
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Nov; 39(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 18295185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the tip of the tongue: learning typing and pointing with an intra-oral computer interface.
    Caltenco HA; Breidegard B; Struijk LN
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 23931550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks.
    Smith MW; Sharit J; Czaja SJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 10665207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related differences in performance and stimulus processing in dual task situation.
    Hahn M; Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1414():66-76. PubMed ID: 21871612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tactile feedback exceeds visual feedback to display tissue slippage in a laparoscopic grasper.
    Westebring-van der Putten EP; Lysen WW; Henssen VD; Koopmans N; Goossens RH; van den Dobbelsteen JJ; Dankelman J; Jakimowcz J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():420-5. PubMed ID: 19377198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of menu structure and touch screen scrolling style on the variability of glance durations during in-vehicle visual search tasks.
    Kujala T; Saariluoma P
    Ergonomics; 2011 Aug; 54(8):716-32. PubMed ID: 21846310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device.
    Akamatsu M; MacKenzie IS; Hasbroucq T
    Ergonomics; 1995 Apr; 38(4):816-27. PubMed ID: 7729406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the use of immersive virtual reality, mouse and touchscreen in pointing and dragging-and-dropping tasks among young, middle-aged and older adults.
    Chen J; Or C
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Nov; 65():437-448. PubMed ID: 28395855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Touch-screen technology usage in toddlers.
    Ahearne C; Dilworth S; Rollings R; Livingstone V; Murray D
    Arch Dis Child; 2016 Feb; 101(2):181-3. PubMed ID: 26699535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Usability of touch-panel interfaces for older adults.
    Murata A; Iwase H
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):767-76. PubMed ID: 16553065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of age in usability testing.
    Sonderegger A; Schmutz S; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():291-300. PubMed ID: 26360221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of touchscreen versus keyboard/mouse interaction for large screen process control displays.
    Noah B; Li J; Rothrock L
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Oct; 64():1-13. PubMed ID: 28610809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the Usability of Touch Screen Gestures for Older and Younger Adults.
    Gao Q; Sun Q
    Hum Factors; 2015 Aug; 57(5):835-63. PubMed ID: 25957042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Both age and physical activity level impact on eye-hand coordination.
    Van Halewyck F; Lavrysen A; Levin O; Boisgontier MP; Elliott D; Helsen WF
    Hum Mov Sci; 2014 Aug; 36():80-96. PubMed ID: 24964357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multimodal feedback for the acquisition of small targets.
    Cockburn A; Brewster S
    Ergonomics; 2005 Jul; 48(9):1129-50. PubMed ID: 16251152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.