172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25683607)
1. Comparing the quality of passively-scattered proton and photon tomotherapy plans for brain and head and neck disease sites.
Kainz K; Firat S; Wilson JF; Schultz C; Siker M; Wang A; Olson D; Li XA
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Mar; 60(6):2167-77. PubMed ID: 25683607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-scenario based robust intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plans can account for set-up errors more effectively in terms of normal tissue sparing than planning target volume (PTV) based intensity-modulated photon plans in the head and neck region.
Stuschke M; Kaiser A; Abu Jawad J; Pöttgen C; Levegrün S; Farr J
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Jun; 8():145. PubMed ID: 23773560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Proton beam radiotherapy versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for uveal melanomas: A comparative study.
Weber DC; Bogner J; Verwey J; Georg D; Dieckmann K; Escudé L; Caro M; Pötter R; Goitein G; Lomax AJ; Miralbell R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 16168832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison.
Kandula S; Zhu X; Garden AS; Gillin M; Rosenthal DI; Ang KK; Mohan R; Amin MV; Garcia JA; Wu R; Sahoo N; Frank SJ
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 23916884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fraction optimization for hybrid proton-photon treatment planning.
Li W; Zhang W; Lin Y; Chen RC; Gao H
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3311-3323. PubMed ID: 36786202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of interfractional changes in head and neck cancer patients on the delivered dose in intensity modulated radiotherapy with protons and photons.
Müller BS; Duma MN; Kampfer S; Nill S; Oelfke U; Geinitz H; Wilkens JJ
Phys Med; 2015 May; 31(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 25724350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans--Pareto front evaluation of plans from a new treatment planning system.
Petersson K; Ceberg C; Engström P; Benedek H; Nilsson P; Knöös T
Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3130-8. PubMed ID: 21815387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of photon and proton treatment techniques for chondrosarcoma of thoracic spine.
Yadav P; Paliwal BR; Kozak K
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 23541524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment planning for radiotherapy with very high-energy electron beams and comparison of VHEE and VMAT plans.
Bazalova-Carter M; Qu B; Palma B; Hårdemark B; Hynning E; Jensen C; Maxim PG; Loo BW
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2615-25. PubMed ID: 25979053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning.
Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SU-E-T-438: Optimal Proton Beam Energy to Treat Adult CNS, Adult Head and Neck, and Pediatric Cancers.
Kainz K; Firat S; Wilson J; Li X
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3805. PubMed ID: 28517199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A planning comparison of dynamic IMRT for different collimator leaf thicknesses with helical tomotherapy and RapidArc for prostate and head and neck tumors.
Jacob V; Bayer W; Astner ST; Busch R; Kneschaurek P
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Sep; 186(9):502-10. PubMed ID: 20803184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
