These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25684707)

  • 1. Tests of calibration and goodness-of-fit in the survival setting.
    Demler OV; Paynter NP; Cook NR
    Stat Med; 2015 May; 34(10):1659-80. PubMed ID: 25684707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reclassification calibration test for censored survival data: performance and comparison to goodness-of-fit criteria.
    Demler OV; Paynter NP; Cook NR
    Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():. PubMed ID: 30984876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cautionary note on the use of the Grønnesby and Borgan goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model.
    May S; Hosmer DW
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2004 Sep; 10(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 15456108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model for assessing cardiovascular risk in a Korean population.
    Park GM; Han S; Kim SH; Jo MW; Her SH; Lee JB; Lee MS; Kim HC; Ahn JM; Lee SW; Kim YH; Kim BJ; Koh JM; Kim HK; Choe J; Park SW; Park SJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Nov; 7(6):944-51. PubMed ID: 25351481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure.
    Tangri N; Stevens LA; Griffith J; Tighiouart H; Djurdjev O; Naimark D; Levin A; Levey AS
    JAMA; 2011 Apr; 305(15):1553-9. PubMed ID: 21482743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Re-calibration of coronary risk prediction: an example of the Seven Countries Study.
    Puddu PE; Piras P; Kromhout D; Tolonen H; Kafatos A; Menotti A
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):17552. PubMed ID: 29242638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A simplified method of calculating an overall goodness-of-fit test for the Cox proportional hazards model.
    May S; Hosmer DW
    Lifetime Data Anal; 1998; 4(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 9658770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the goodness of fit of logistic regression models in large samples: A modification of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.
    Nattino G; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
    Biometrics; 2020 Jun; 76(2):549-560. PubMed ID: 32134502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardizing the power of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test in large data sets.
    Paul P; Pennell ML; Lemeshow S
    Stat Med; 2013 Jan; 32(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 22833304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing goodness of fit of a uniform truncation model.
    Mandel M; Betensky RA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 17688493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of SVM parameter optimization on discrimination and calibration for post-procedural PCI mortality.
    Matheny ME; Resnic FS; Arora N; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2007 Dec; 40(6):688-97. PubMed ID: 17600771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical inference methods for two crossing survival curves: a comparison of methods.
    Li H; Han D; Hou Y; Chen H; Chen Z
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116774. PubMed ID: 25615624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power and sample size calculations for interval-censored survival analysis.
    Kim HY; Williamson JM; Lin HM
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1390-400. PubMed ID: 26643411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination and calibration of mortality risk prediction models in interventional cardiology.
    Matheny ME; Ohno-Machado L; Resnic FS
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):367-75. PubMed ID: 16198996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the calibration of mortality benchmarks in critical care: The Hosmer-Lemeshow test revisited.
    Kramer AA; Zimmerman JE
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Sep; 35(9):2052-6. PubMed ID: 17568333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semen analysis and prediction of natural conception.
    Leushuis E; van der Steeg JW; Steures P; Repping S; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW; Hompes PG; van der Veen F
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1360-7. PubMed ID: 24795091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new test and graphical tool to assess the goodness of fit of logistic regression models.
    Nattino G; Finazzi S; Bertolini G
    Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):709-20. PubMed ID: 26439593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival Regression Modeling Strategies in CVD Prediction.
    Barkhordari M; Padyab M; Sardarinia M; Hadaegh F; Azizi F; Bozorgmanesh M
    Int J Endocrinol Metab; 2016 Apr; 14(2):e32156. PubMed ID: 28058053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study to alternatives to the log-rank test.
    Dormuth I; Liu T; Xu J; Pauly M; Ditzhaus M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 May; 128():107165. PubMed ID: 36972865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therapeutic implications of selecting the SCORE (European) versus the D'AGOSTINO (American) risk charts for cardiovascular risk assessment in hypertensive patients.
    Gómez-Marcos MA; Martínez-Salgado C; Martin-Cantera C; Recio-Rodríguez JI; Castaño-Sánchez Y; Giné-Garriga M; Rodriguez-Sanchez E; García-Ortiz L
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2009 May; 9():17. PubMed ID: 19432982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.