BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25685882)

  • 1. iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: a survey of family wants, needs, and preferences.
    Meder AM; Wegner JR
    Augment Altern Commun; 2015 Mar; 31(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 25685882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment With Children Who Need Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC): Clinical Decisions of AAC Specialists.
    Lund SK; Quach W; Weissling K; McKelvey M; Dietz A
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2017 Jan; 48(1):56-68. PubMed ID: 28114681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Challenges and opportunities in augmentative and alternative communication: Research and technology development to enhance communication and participation for individuals with complex communication needs.
    Light J; McNaughton D; Beukelman D; Fager SK; Fried-Oken M; Jakobs T; Jakobs E
    Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Mar; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 30648903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and evaluation of a mobile AAC: a virtual therapist and speech assistant for people with communication disabilities.
    Wang EH; Zhou L; Chen SK; Hill K; Parmanto B
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Nov; 13(8):731-739. PubMed ID: 28949264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Now I am a techie too" - parental perceptions of using mobile technology for communication by children with complex communication needs in the Global South.
    Hettiarachchi S; Kitnasamy G; Gopi D
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2020 Feb; 15(2):183-194. PubMed ID: 30735067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of communication style and influences on intervention practices for young children with AAC needs.
    Finke EH; Quinn E
    Augment Altern Commun; 2012 Jun; 28(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 22670729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Designing augmentative and alternative communication applications: the results of focus groups with speech-language pathologists and parents of children with autism spectrum disorder.
    Boster JB; McCarthy JW
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 May; 13(4):353-365. PubMed ID: 28488902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication.
    McNaughton D; Light J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2013 Jun; 29(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23705813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in communicative access solutions for children with cerebral palsy.
    Myrden A; Schudlo L; Weyand S; Zeyl T; Chau T
    J Child Neurol; 2014 Aug; 29(8):1108-18. PubMed ID: 24820337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Programing AAC just-in-time for beginning communicators: the process.
    Holyfield C; Caron J; Light J
    Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Dec; 35(4):309-318. PubMed ID: 31790292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Putting people first: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention.
    Light J; McNaughton D
    Augment Altern Commun; 2013 Dec; 29(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 24229334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech language pathologists' responses to the rejection or abandonment of AAC systems.
    Moorcroft A; Allum J; Scarinci N
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Aug; 44(16):4257-4265. PubMed ID: 33745410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parents' perception on the use of augmentative and alternative communication by children with complex communication needs in Malaysia.
    Joginder Singh S; Mohd Ayob N; Hassan FH
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2023 Jan; 18(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 36344474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technologies and strategies for people with communication problems following brain injury or stroke.
    Wallace T; Bradshaw A
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2011; 28(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 21558626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech pathologist perspectives on the acceptance versus rejection or abandonment of AAC systems for children with complex communication needs.
    Moorcroft A; Scarinci N; Meyer C
    Augment Altern Commun; 2019 Sep; 35(3):193-204. PubMed ID: 31307237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Providing Services to Individuals With Complex Communication Needs in the Inpatient Rehabilitation Setting: The Experiences and Perspectives of Speech-Language Pathologists.
    Gormley J; Light J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 May; 28(2):456-468. PubMed ID: 31136227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the design of augmentative and alternative technologies for young children.
    Light JC; Drager KD
    Assist Technol; 2002; 14(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 12739847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Australian speech-language pathologists' perceptions and experiences of augmentative and alternative communication in early childhood intervention.
    Iacono T; Cameron M
    Augment Altern Commun; 2009 Dec; 25(4):236-49. PubMed ID: 19883286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of preservice training in augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational therapists.
    Costigan FA; Light J
    Assist Technol; 2010; 22(4):200-12; quiz 213-4. PubMed ID: 21306066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing First Graders' Attitudes and Preferences Toward a Peer Using an iPad(®)-Based Speech-Generating Device and a Non-Electronic AAC System.
    Hyppa-Martin J; Collins D; Chen M; Amundson C; Timinski K; Mizuko M
    Augment Altern Commun; 2016 Jun; 32(2):94-104. PubMed ID: 26911706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.