These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The development of metamemory monitoring during retrieval: the case of memory strength and memory absence. Ghetti S; Lyons KE; Lazzarin F; Cornoldi C J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 Mar; 99(3):157-81. PubMed ID: 18191139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Memory characteristics of recently imagined events and real events experienced previously. Stern ER; Rotello CM Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(4):569-90. PubMed ID: 11131743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reality monitoring of performed and imagined interactive events: developmental and contextual effects. Sussman AL J Exp Child Psychol; 2001 Jun; 79(2):115-38. PubMed ID: 11343405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imagining the personal past: Episodic counterfactuals compared to episodic memories and episodic future projections. Özbek M; Bohn A; Berntsen D Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):375-389. PubMed ID: 27873188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Age differences in source forgetting: effects on reality monitoring and on eyewitness testimony. Cohen G; Faulkner D Psychol Aging; 1989 Mar; 4(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 2803602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metacomprehension judgements reflect the belief that diagrams improve learning from text. Serra MJ; Dunlosky J Memory; 2010 Oct; 18(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 20730677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrieval and phenomenology of autobiographical memories in blind individuals. Tekcan AÍ; Yılmaz E; Kızılöz BK; Karadöller DZ; Mutafoğlu M; Erciyes AA Memory; 2015; 23(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 24528249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characteristics of memories for near-death experiences. Moore LE; Greyson B Conscious Cogn; 2017 May; 51():116-124. PubMed ID: 28329717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discriminating memories for actual and imagined taste experiences: a reality monitoring approach. Kahan T; Mohsen R; Tandez J; McDonald J Am J Psychol; 1999; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 10696279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Separating past and future autobiographical events in memory: evidence for a reality monitoring asymmetry. McDonough IM; Gallo DA Mem Cognit; 2010 Jan; 38(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 19966233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Counterfactual Plausibility and Comparative Similarity. Stanley ML; Stewart GW; Brigard F Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 5():1216-1228. PubMed ID: 28500675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emotional impact feedback affects how people remember an analogue trauma event. Takarangi MK; Segovia DA; Dawson E; Strange D Memory; 2014; 22(8):1041-51. PubMed ID: 24345183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Effects of specificity of schema on false recall: an analysis from the viewpoint of eyewitness testimony]. Tanaka A; Hirose T; Takaoka M Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2005 Feb; 75(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 15782583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of spatial contextual familiarity on remembered scenes, episodic memories, and imagined future events. Robin J; Moscovitch M J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):459-75. PubMed ID: 24219084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]