449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25687168)
1. Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1101-10. PubMed ID: 25687168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A structural classification of strategies for confounding control in research design].
He YN; Liu LL; Cai QY; Zhao NQ; Zheng YJ
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 39(7):999-1002. PubMed ID: 30060319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A counterfactual approach to bias and effect modification in terms of response types.
Suzuki E; Mitsuhashi T; Tsuda T; Yamamoto E
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jul; 13():101. PubMed ID: 23902658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Time-dependent confounding in the estimation of treatment effects in randomised trials with multimodal therapies--an illustration of the problem of time-dependent confounding by causal graphs].
Zietemann VD; Schuster T; Duell TH
Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Jan; 77(1):62-6. PubMed ID: 24203687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Causal Diagrams: Pitfalls and Tips.
Suzuki E; Shinozaki T; Yamamoto E
J Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 30(4):153-162. PubMed ID: 32009103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Causal Inference in Medicine Part II. Directed acyclic graphs--a useful method for confounder selection, categorization of potential biases, and hypothesis specification].
Suzuki E; Komatsu H; Yorifuji T; Yamamoto E; Doi H; Tsuda T
Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 64(4):796-805. PubMed ID: 19797848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
Didelez V; Sheehan N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 17715159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What random assignment does and does not do.
Krause MS; Howard KI
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction to causal diagrams for confounder selection.
Williamson EJ; Aitken Z; Lawrie J; Dharmage SC; Burgess JA; Forbes AB
Respirology; 2014 Apr; 19(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 24447391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Graphical Models for Quasi-experimental Designs.
Steiner PM; Kim Y; Hall CE; Su D
Sociol Methods Res; 2017 Mar; 46(2):155-188. PubMed ID: 30174355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Causal Methods for Observational Research: A Primer.
Almasi-Hashiani A; Nedjat S; Mansournia MA
Arch Iran Med; 2018 Apr; 21(4):164-169. PubMed ID: 29693407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Errors in causal inference: an organizational schema for systematic error and random error.
Suzuki E; Tsuda T; Mitsuhashi T; Mansournia MA; Yamamoto E
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):788-793.e1. PubMed ID: 27771142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?
Hernán MA; Robins JM
Epidemiology; 2006 Jul; 17(4):360-72. PubMed ID: 16755261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Causal analysis approaches in epidemiology].
Dumas O; Siroux V; Le Moual N; Varraso R
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2014 Feb; 62(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 24388738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model Averaging for Improving Inference from Causal Diagrams.
Hamra GB; Kaufman JS; Vahratian A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Aug; 12(8):9391-407. PubMed ID: 26270672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dependence of confounding on the target population: a modification of causal graphs to account for co-action.
Flanders WD; Johnson CY; Howards PP; Greenland S
Ann Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 21(9):698-705. PubMed ID: 21737305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Graphical presentation of confounding in directed acyclic graphs.
Suttorp MM; Siegerink B; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1418-23. PubMed ID: 25324358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Causal graphical views of fixed effects and random effects models.
Kim Y; Steiner PM
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 May; 74(2):165-183. PubMed ID: 33063334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
