These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25687332)

  • 21. Sleep-deprived car-following: Indicators of rear-end crash potential.
    Mahajan K; Velaga NR
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106123. PubMed ID: 33862404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of real-world connected vehicle data in identifying high-risk locations based on a new surrogate safety measure.
    Xie K; Yang D; Ozbay K; Yang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Apr; 125():311-319. PubMed ID: 29983165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a lane change risk index using vehicle trajectory data.
    Park H; Oh C; Moon J; Kim S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():1-8. PubMed ID: 29078072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data.
    Oh C; Kim T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 20728639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Can the speed limit be used as a surrogate for the striking vehicle's travel speed or delta-V in police-reported rear-end crashes?
    Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):178-183. PubMed ID: 35929865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of rear turn-signal characteristics on crash risk.
    Sullivan JM; Flannagan MJ
    J Safety Res; 2012 Feb; 43(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 22385741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of heavy vehicle-involved rear-end crash potential using WIM data.
    Jo Y; Oh C; Kim S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():103-113. PubMed ID: 30991289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validating a driving simulator using surrogate safety measures.
    Yan X; Abdel-Aty M; Radwan E; Wang X; Chilakapati P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):274-88. PubMed ID: 18215559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determining the drivers' acceptance of EFTCD in highway work zones.
    Bai Y; Li Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):762-8. PubMed ID: 21376864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimating rear-end accident probabilities at signalized intersections: a comparison study of intersections with and without green signal countdown devices.
    Ni Y; Li K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(6):583-90. PubMed ID: 24867568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Road safety from the perspective of driver gender and age as related to the injury crash frequency and road scenario.
    Russo F; Biancardo SA; Dell'Acqua G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24279963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting driver reaction time and deceleration: Comparison of perception-reaction thresholds and evidence accumulation framework.
    Durrani U; Lee C; Shah D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105889. PubMed ID: 33248429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Human-Like Lane Change Decision Model for Autonomous Vehicles that Considers the Risk Perception of Drivers in Mixed Traffic.
    Wang C; Sun Q; Li Z; Zhang H
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32316210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using perceptual cues for brake response to a lead vehicle: Comparing threshold and accumulator models of visual looming.
    Xue Q; Markkula G; Yan X; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():114-124. PubMed ID: 29929099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK.
    Pariota L; Bifulco GN; Galante F; Montella A; Brackstone M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():74-87. PubMed ID: 26828955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments.
    Kiefer RJ; LeBlanc DJ; Flannagan CA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2005 Mar; 37(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 15667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system.
    Li Y; Wang H; Wang W; Liu S; Xiang Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Aug; 17(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 26761633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is vehicle automation enough to prevent crashes? Role of traffic operations in automated driving environments for traffic safety.
    Jeong E; Oh C; Lee S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jul; 104():115-124. PubMed ID: 28499140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers.
    Neyens DM; Boyle LN
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):206-12. PubMed ID: 16996017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.