These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25687518)

  • 1. The influence of question design on the response to self-assessment in www.elearnSCI.org: a submodule pilot study.
    Liu N; Li XW; Zhou MW; Biering-Sørensen F
    Spinal Cord; 2015 Aug; 53(8):604-7. PubMed ID: 25687518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of and satisfaction with www.elearnSCI.org for training of nurse students: a submodule pilot study.
    Liu N; Li XW; Zhou MW; Krassioukov AV; Biering-Sørensen F
    Spinal Cord; 2014 Oct; 52(10):774-8. PubMed ID: 25069789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple choice questions: a literature review on the optimal number of options.
    Vyas R; Supe A
    Natl Med J India; 2008; 21(3):130-3. PubMed ID: 19004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smartphone learning as an adjunct to vascular teaching - a pilot project.
    Mughal NA; Atkins ER; Morrow D; Al-Jundi W
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Mar; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29544474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits of testing for learning on later performance.
    McConnell MM; St-Onge C; Young ME
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):305-20. PubMed ID: 24973998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions.
    Chandratilake M; Davis M; Ponnamperuma G
    Natl Med J India; 2011; 24(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 22208143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the potential influence of established multiple-choice test-taking cues on item response in a pharmacotherapy board certification examination preparatory manual: a pilot study.
    Gettig JP
    Pharmacotherapy; 2006 Apr; 26(4):558-62. PubMed ID: 16553516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. www.elearnSCI.org: a global educational initiative of ISCoS.
    Chhabra HS; Harvey LA; Muldoon S; Chaudhary S; Arora M; Brown DJ; Biering-Sorensen F; Wyndaele JJ; Charlifue S; Horsewell J; Ducharme S; Green D; Simpson D; Glinsky J; Weerts E; Upadhyay N; Aito S; Wing P; Katoh S; Kovindha A; Krassioukov A; Weeks C; Srikumar V; Reeves R; Siriwardane C; Hasnan N; Kalke YB; Lanig I
    Spinal Cord; 2013 Mar; 51(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 23448857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving learning during pediatric lectures with multiple choice questions.
    Serane TV; Arun Babu T; Menon R; Devagaran V; Kothendaraman B
    Indian J Pediatr; 2011 Aug; 78(8):983-6. PubMed ID: 21327338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.
    Rotthoff T; Baehring T; Dicken HD; Fahron U; Richter B; Fischer MR; Scherbaum WA
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 6():50. PubMed ID: 17032439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing the number of options on multiple-choice questions: response time, psychometrics and standard setting.
    Schneid SD; Armour C; Park YS; Yudkowsky R; Bordage G
    Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 48(10):1020-7. PubMed ID: 25200022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between three option, four option and five option multiple choice question tests for quality parameters: A randomized study.
    Vegada B; Shukla A; Khilnani A; Charan J; Desai C
    Indian J Pharmacol; 2016; 48(5):571-575. PubMed ID: 27721545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying student misconceptions in biomedical course assessments in dental education.
    Curtis DA; Lind SL; Dellinges M; Schroeder K
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1183-94. PubMed ID: 22942414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cues and pseudocues in surgical multiple choice questions from the German state examination].
    de Laffolie J; Visser D; Hirschburger M; Turial S
    Chirurg; 2017 Mar; 88(3):239-243. PubMed ID: 27678403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative study of students' performance in preclinical physiology assessed by multiple choice and short essay questions.
    Oyebola DD; Adewoye OE; Iyaniwura JO; Alada AR; Fasanmade AA; Raji Y
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2000; 29(3-4):201-5. PubMed ID: 11713989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions.
    Rangel RH; Möller L; Sitter H; Stibane T; Strzelczyk A
    Med Teach; 2017 Nov; 39(11):1189-1194. PubMed ID: 28799435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions.
    Premadasa IG
    Med Teach; 1993; 15(2-3):237-42. PubMed ID: 8246720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.