These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2568811)

  • 1. Arterial bolus curve after intravenous injection of ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Gmelin E; Rinast E; Ollrogge C
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():67-9. PubMed ID: 2568811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Arterial bolus dynamics of ionic and nonionic contrast media in intravenous administration].
    Gmelin E; Rinast E; Ollrogge C
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jan; 40(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 3823759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of an ionic and a nonionic (sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iopromide) x-ray contrast medium of hemorrheology.
    Strecker EP; Stengel M; Witte S
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():24-7. PubMed ID: 2568803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Pharmacokinetics and tolerance of roentgen contrast media].
    Schmiedel E
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jan; 40(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 3547606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection.
    Claussen CD; Banzer D; Pfretzschner C; Kalender WA; Schörner W
    Radiology; 1984 Nov; 153(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 6484168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The possibility of side effects during the application of roentgenologic contrast media by the method of the biphasic bolus/perfusor injection and the monophasic bolus injection (author's transl)].
    Kirschner H; Kremp A; Poppe H
    Rofo; 1980 Aug; 133(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 6449424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Contribution to the study of angio-TC: timing of exposure and subsequent venous lavage].
    Schad N; Rohde U; Pastremoli A
    Radiol Med; 1984 Jun; 70(6):369-78. PubMed ID: 6533697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion.
    Blomley MJ; Coulden R; Bufkin C; Lipton MJ; Dawson P
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Nov; 28 Suppl 5():S72-7; discussion S78. PubMed ID: 8282508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Product selection criteria for intravascular ionic contrast media.
    Swanson DP; Dick TJ; Simms SM; Thrall JH
    Clin Pharm; 1985; 4(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 3902331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous injections of contrast media Studies using chronography].
    Claussen CD; Linke G; Felix R; Lochner B; Weinmann HJ; Wegener OH
    Rofo; 1982 Aug; 137(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 6215308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Asymptomatic blood pressure and pulse rate changes during intravenous urography. Ionic contrast media vs. nonionic contrast media].
    Miwa K
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Sep; 50(9):1082-6. PubMed ID: 2247349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acute and late adverse reactions to low-osmolal contrast media.
    Mikkonen R; Kontkanen T; Kivisaari L
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Jan; 36(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 7833173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Intravenous contrast medium bolus injection in computer tomography with the TuR DZ11 high-pressure injector].
    Fiebig K; Freitag J; Freitag G; Siegfried P
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 6844585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. With helical CT, is nonionic contrast a better choice than ionic contrast for rapid and large IV bolus injections?
    Hopper KD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Mar; 166(3):715. PubMed ID: 8623657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast administration and techniques of digital subtraction angiography performance.
    Saddekni S; Sos TA; Srur M; Cohn DJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):275-91. PubMed ID: 3887486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency and effects of extravasation of ionic and nonionic CT contrast media during rapid bolus injection.
    Federle MP; Chang PJ; Confer S; Ozgun B
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):637-40. PubMed ID: 9494479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [State of the art and developmental trends of venous and arterial digital subtraction angiography in neuroradiology].
    Huber G; Piepgras U
    Radiologe; 1984 Apr; 24(4):155-63. PubMed ID: 6374751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravenous digital subtraction: a summary of recent developments.
    Riederer SJ; Kruger RA
    Radiology; 1983 Jun; 147(3):633-8. PubMed ID: 6342027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.