208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2568816)
1. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
Scherberich JE; Fischer A; Rautschka E; Kollath J; Riemann H
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
Stacul F; Carraro M; Magnaldi S; Faccini L; Guarnieri G; Dalla Palma L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast nephrotoxicity: a randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent.
Schwab SJ; Hlatky MA; Pieper KS; Davidson CJ; Morris KG; Skelton TN; Bashore TM
N Engl J Med; 1989 Jan; 320(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 2643042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.
Mützel W; Langer M; Keysser R
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():101-4. PubMed ID: 2568774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Urinary protein excretion following intravenously administered ionic and non-ionic contrast media in man.
Skovgaard N; Holm J; Hemmingsen L; Skaarup P
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 2692667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media: a prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings.
Katholi RE; Taylor GJ; Woods WT; Womack KA; Katholi CR; McCann WP; Moses HW; Dove JT; Mikell FL; Woodruff RC
Radiology; 1993 Jan; 186(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 8416561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of contrast media osmolality on intravenous urographic quality.
Lovett I; Benn I; Benness G; Doust B
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():105-7. PubMed ID: 2568775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transfemoral digital subtraction aortography. Are diluted high osmolar contrast media acceptable?
Naisby GP; Owen JP; Alexander TW; Cope L; Laker MF; Hamilton PJ
Acta Radiol; 1991 Mar; 32(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 2031798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Urography and renal clearance of contrast media. A randomized comparison of an ionic high-osmolar and a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium].
Vestergaard AS; Thomsen HS
Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jan; 152(3):154-7. PubMed ID: 2405555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of renal function before and after intravenous injection of non-cholangiographic water soluble contrast media in rats.
Verbaeys A; Ringoir S; Kesteloot D; Van Maele G; Lameire N
Acta Urol Belg; 1995 Mar; 63(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 7725984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tubular nephrotoxicity after intravenous urography with ionic high-osmolal and nonionic low-osmolal contrast media in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
Cavaliere G; Arrigo G; D'Amico G; Bernasconi P; Schiavina G; Dellafiore L; Vergnaghi D
Nephron; 1987; 46(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 2885767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast media and nephropathy: findings from systematic analysis and Food and Drug Administration reports of adverse effects.
Solomon R; Dumouchel W
Invest Radiol; 2006 Aug; 41(8):651-60. PubMed ID: 16829749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M
Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Nephrotoxicity of contrast media. Comparison of iopamidol and diatrizoate by measurement of urinary enzymes after urography].
Schiavina G; Arrigo G; Vergnaghi D; Cavaliere G; Scarduelli B; Luzzatti G; D'Amico G
Radiol Med; 1984 Apr; 70(4):176-9. PubMed ID: 6150520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Enzyme determination in the urine for the evaluation of kidney tolerance of the water-soluble roentgen contrast medium iopamidol].
Hartmann HG; Jutzler GA; Bambauer R; Keller HE; Maruhn D
Radiologe; 1984 Sep; 24(9):442-5. PubMed ID: 6494455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nephrotoxicity from contrast media: attenuation with theophylline.
Katholi RE; Taylor GJ; McCann WP; Woods WT; Womack KA; McCoy CD; Katholi CR; Moses HW; Mishkel GJ; Lucore CL
Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 7892462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
