182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2568817)
1. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.
Mützel W; Langer M; Keysser R
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():101-4. PubMed ID: 2568774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of an ionic and a nonionic (sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iopromide) x-ray contrast medium of hemorrheology.
Strecker EP; Stengel M; Witte S
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():24-7. PubMed ID: 2568803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
Scherberich JE; Fischer A; Rautschka E; Kollath J; Riemann H
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
Stacul F; Carraro M; Magnaldi S; Faccini L; Guarnieri G; Dalla Palma L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urinary protein excretion following intravenously administered ionic and non-ionic contrast media in man.
Skovgaard N; Holm J; Hemmingsen L; Skaarup P
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 2692667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Comparison of 2 non-ionic radiographic contrast agents in intravenous subtraction angiography].
Kristensen J; Andresen JH
Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Jun; 151(23):1474-5. PubMed ID: 2660379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients.
Hagen B; Wenzel-Hora BI
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravenous injection of ioxilan, iohexol and diatrizoate. Effects on urine profiles in the rat.
Thomsen HS; Dorph S; Mygind T; Sovak M; Nielsen H; Rygaard H; Larsen S; Skaarup P; Hemmingsen L; Holm J
Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 2964835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Contrast media in cardiology. Report of a randomized, double-blind multicenter comparative study of the side effects of ionic and non-ionic roentgen contrast media].
Hellige G; Vogel B; Tebbe U; Kreuzer H
Z Kardiol; 1992 May; 81(5):290-2. PubMed ID: 1621410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
Hartwig P; Mützel W; Taenzer V
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study].
Schmiedel E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 1610929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
