These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2568817)

  • 1. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Renal excretion of iopromide and iopamidol after intravenous administration in digital subtraction angiography.
    Mützel W; Langer M; Keysser R
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():101-4. PubMed ID: 2568774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of an ionic and a nonionic (sodium meglumine diatrizoate and iopromide) x-ray contrast medium of hemorrheology.
    Strecker EP; Stengel M; Witte S
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():24-7. PubMed ID: 2568803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
    Scherberich JE; Fischer A; Rautschka E; Kollath J; Riemann H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Stacul F; Carraro M; Magnaldi S; Faccini L; Guarnieri G; Dalla Palma L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Urinary protein excretion following intravenously administered ionic and non-ionic contrast media in man.
    Skovgaard N; Holm J; Hemmingsen L; Skaarup P
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(5):517-9. PubMed ID: 2692667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
    Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW; Hayakawa K; Sahler LG; Ekholm S
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF; Carmody RF; Smith JR; Horsley WW; Criss E
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of 2 non-ionic radiographic contrast agents in intravenous subtraction angiography].
    Kristensen J; Andresen JH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1989 Jun; 151(23):1474-5. PubMed ID: 2660379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
    Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients.
    Hagen B; Wenzel-Hora BI
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intravenous injection of ioxilan, iohexol and diatrizoate. Effects on urine profiles in the rat.
    Thomsen HS; Dorph S; Mygind T; Sovak M; Nielsen H; Rygaard H; Larsen S; Skaarup P; Hemmingsen L; Holm J
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 2964835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Buyan N; Arab M; Hasanoğlu E; Gökçora N; Ercan S
    Turk J Pediatr; 1995; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF; Bergsjordet B; Seeger JF; Cacayorin ED
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Contrast media in cardiology. Report of a randomized, double-blind multicenter comparative study of the side effects of ionic and non-ionic roentgen contrast media].
    Hellige G; Vogel B; Tebbe U; Kreuzer H
    Z Kardiol; 1992 May; 81(5):290-2. PubMed ID: 1621410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pharmacokinetics of iohexol, iopamidol, iopromide, and iosimide compared with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Hartwig P; Mützel W; Taenzer V
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():220-3. PubMed ID: 2568800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of iopromide with iopamidol and iohexol for contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Goldberg SN; Abrahams J; Drayer BP; Golding S; Bernardino M; Brunetti J
    Invest Radiol; 1994 May; 29 Suppl 1():S76-83; discussion S93. PubMed ID: 8071050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tolerability of nonionic contrast media--results of a multicenter double blind study].
    Schmiedel E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 1610929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.