These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25688641)

  • 41. Do great teams think alike? An examination of team mental models and their impact on team performance.
    Gardner AK; Scott DJ; AbdelFattah KR
    Surgery; 2017 May; 161(5):1203-1208. PubMed ID: 28063607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability.
    Chiu CC; Owens BP; Tesluk PE
    J Appl Psychol; 2016 Dec; 101(12):1705-1720. PubMed ID: 27618409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of supervisor creative feedback environment on team creativity: The role of the ambidextrous learning and creative cognitive style.
    Liu S; Zhang Y; Liu Y; He L; Xiao Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1007947. PubMed ID: 36389565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Are We All in the Same Boat? The Role of Perceptual Distance in Organizational Health Interventions.
    Hasson H; von Thiele Schwarz U; Nielsen K; Tafvelin S
    Stress Health; 2016 Oct; 32(4):294-303. PubMed ID: 27501357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are Neurodynamic Organizations A Fundamental Property of Teamwork?
    Stevens RH; Galloway TL
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():644. PubMed ID: 28512438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. In search of mediators of leadership behavior to Team Creativity in Team Start-ups.
    Antonio T; Indrianto ATL; Padmawidjaja L
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():951603. PubMed ID: 36267075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity.
    Zhou J; Wang XM; Song LJ; Wu J
    J Appl Psychol; 2017 Feb; 102(2):180-202. PubMed ID: 27893257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Dynamic leadership emergence: Differential impact of members' and peers' contributions in the idea generation and idea enactment phases of innovation project teams.
    Lee SM; Farh CIC
    J Appl Psychol; 2019 Mar; 104(3):411-432. PubMed ID: 30640493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Are creative individuals bad apples? A dual pathway model of unethical behavior.
    Keem S; Shalley CE; Kim E; Jeong I
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Apr; 103(4):416-431. PubMed ID: 29239642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Training adaptive teams.
    Gorman JC; Cooke NJ; Amazeen PG
    Hum Factors; 2010 Apr; 52(2):295-307. PubMed ID: 20942257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: the interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification.
    Pearsall MJ; Venkataramani V
    J Appl Psychol; 2015 May; 100(3):735-48. PubMed ID: 25384202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance.
    Madjar N; Greenberg E; Chen Z
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Jul; 96(4):730-43. PubMed ID: 21319879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Enhancing the transfer of computer-assisted training proficiency in geographically distributed teams.
    Kirkman BL; Rosen B; Tesluk PE; Gibson CB
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 May; 91(3):706-16. PubMed ID: 16737366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Honor among thieves: The interaction of team and member deviance on trust in the team.
    Schabram K; Robinson SL; Cruz KS
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Sep; 103(9):1057-1066. PubMed ID: 29722998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Guiding Engineering Student Teams' Ethics Discussions with Peer Advising.
    Lee EA; Gans N; Grohman M; Tacca M; Brown MJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Jun; 26(3):1743-1769. PubMed ID: 32240494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research.
    Zeng A; Fan Y; Di Z; Wang Y; Havlin S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Oct; 5(10):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 33820976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Enhancing majority members' pro-diversity beliefs in small teams: the facilitating effect of self-anchoring.
    van Veelen R; Otten S; Hansen N
    Exp Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 23895925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. When teams shift among processes: insights from simulation and optimization.
    Kennedy DM; McComb SA
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 Sep; 99(5):784-815. PubMed ID: 25068813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.
    West C; Landry K; Graham A; Graham L; Cianciolo AT; Kalet A; Rosen M; Sherman DW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(4):366-9. PubMed ID: 26507993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Flat teams drive scientific innovation.
    Xu F; Wu L; Evans J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(23):e2200927119. PubMed ID: 35658076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.