These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25689002)

  • 1. Expectations and experience: Dissociable bases for cognitive control?
    Bugg JM; Diede NT; Cohen-Shikora ER; Selmeczy D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1349-73. PubMed ID: 25689002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of awareness and secondary task demands on Stroop performance in the pre-cued lists paradigm.
    Bugg JM; Diede NT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():26-35. PubMed ID: 28061943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control.
    Blais C; Harris MB; Guerrero JV; Bunge SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 20521214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When global and local information about attentional demands collide: evidence for global dominance.
    Suh J; Ileri-Tayar M; Bugg JM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):1858-1873. PubMed ID: 35701660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automaticity and cognitive control in the learned predictiveness effect.
    Shone LT; Harris IM; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2015 Jan; 41(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 25706543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transfer of learned cognitive control settings within and between tasks.
    Ileri-Tayar M; Moss C; Bugg JM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Dec; 196():107689. PubMed ID: 36374800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Losing control: Mostly incongruent lists postpone, but do not eliminate, the Stroop effect.
    Ivanoff J; Webb NE; Chahal H; Palango VP; Klein RM; Carroll SR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1169-1181. PubMed ID: 29520714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An observation on the spontaneous noticing of prospective memory event-based cues.
    Knight JB; Meeks JT; Marsh RL; Cook GI; Brewer GA; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 21299328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The shaping of cognitive control based on the adaptive weighting of expectations and experience.
    Suh J; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1563-1584. PubMed ID: 34570546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention modulation by proportion congruency: the asymmetrical list shifting effect.
    Abrahamse EL; Duthoo W; Notebaert W; Risko EF
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1552-62. PubMed ID: 23565794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contextual recruitment of cognitive control in preadolescent children and young adults.
    Surrey C; Kretschmer-Trendowicz A; Altgassen M; Fischer R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():189-207. PubMed ID: 30904826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working memory capacity predicts conflict-task performance.
    Gulbinaite R; Johnson A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1383-400. PubMed ID: 24199908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting.
    Pastötter B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 20053044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning multiple lists at the same time in the Hebb repetition effect.
    Saint-Aubin J; Guérard K; Fiset S; Losier MC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25730643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive control: dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences.
    Fernandez-Duque D; Knight M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):340-55. PubMed ID: 18377175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory consequences of looking back to notice change: Retroactive and proactive facilitation.
    Jacoby LL; Wahlheim CN; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1282-97. PubMed ID: 26010827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive load hypothesis of item-method directed forgetting.
    Lee YS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1110-22. PubMed ID: 22372566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.