These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25689342)

  • 1. Does surgeon subjective nerve sparing score predict recovery time of erectile function following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Kang SG; Schatloff O; Haidar AM; Samavedi S; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR
    J Sex Med; 2015 Jun; 12(6):1490-6. PubMed ID: 25689342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Sivaraman A; Kameh D; Palmer KJ; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):796-802. PubMed ID: 22230713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
    Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective characterization of nerve sparing predicts recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy: defining the utility of a nerve sparing grading system.
    Moskovic DJ; Alphs H; Nelson CJ; Rabbani F; Eastham J; Touijer K; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Mulhall JP
    J Sex Med; 2011 Jan; 8(1):255-60. PubMed ID: 20727065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery?
    Ko YH; Coelho RF; Sivaraman A; Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Carrion RJ; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR
    Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23092543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.
    Basal S; Wambi C; Acikel C; Gupta M; Badani K
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 23186312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Yao A; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26994775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
    BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
    Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.
    Shim JS; Tae JH; Noh TI; Kang SH; Cheon J; Lee JG; Patel VR; Kang SG
    J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Jan; 37(1):e6. PubMed ID: 34981681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratification of Potency Outcomes Following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Based on Age, Preoperative Potency, and Nerve Sparing.
    Seetharam Bhat KR; Moschovas MC; Sandri M; Reddy S; Onol FF; Noel J; Rogers T; Schatloff O; Coelho R; Ko YH; Roof S; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Endourol; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 33947270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Ko WJ; Truesdale MD; Hruby GW; Landman J; Badani KK
    J Sex Med; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21426493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.
    Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Exploratory Decision-Tree Modeling of Data from the Randomized REACTT Trial of Tadalafil Versus Placebo to Predict Recovery of Erectile Function After Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.
    Montorsi F; Oelke M; Henneges C; Brock G; Salonia A; d'Anzeo G; Rossi A; Mulhall JP; Büttner H
    Eur Urol; 2016 Sep; 70(3):529-37. PubMed ID: 26947602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative erectile function is an independent predictor for decision to spare cavernous nerves during radical prostatectomy.
    Stember DS; Nelson CJ; Mulhall JP
    J Sex Med; 2013 Aug; 10(8):2101-7. PubMed ID: 23679104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.