310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25689918)
1. Utilization of reverse osmosis (RO) for reuse of MBR-treated wastewater in irrigation-preliminary tests and quality analysis of product water.
Bunani S; Yörükoğlu E; Sert G; Kabay N; Yüksel Ü; Yüksel M; Egemen Ö; Pek TÖ
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(4):3030-3037. PubMed ID: 25689918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of membrane bioreactor solids retention time on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for wastewater reuse.
Farias EL; Howe KJ; Thomson BM
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():53-61. PubMed ID: 24316181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life cycle cost of a hybrid forward osmosis - low pressure reverse osmosis system for seawater desalination and wastewater recovery.
Valladares Linares R; Li Z; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Ghaffour N; Amy G; Leiknes T; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2016 Jan; 88():225-234. PubMed ID: 26512800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Potable-quality water recovery from primary effluent through a coupled algal-osmosis membrane system.
Jiang W; Lin L; Gedara SMH; Schaub TM; Jarvis JM; Wang X; Xu X; Nirmalakhandan N; Xu P
Chemosphere; 2020 Feb; 240():124883. PubMed ID: 31726606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of SAR (sodium adsorption ratio) between RO and NF processes for the reclamation of secondary effluent.
Chang IS; Lee EW; Oh S; Kim Y
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):313-8. PubMed ID: 16003991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MBR/RO/ozone processes for TFT-LCD industrial wastewater treatment and recycling.
Chen TK; Ni CH; Chan YC; Lu MC
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):411-9. PubMed ID: 16004003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Desalination of mixed tannery effluent with membrane bioreactor and reverse osmosis treatment.
Scholz WG; Rougé P; Bódalo A; Leitz U
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(21):8505-11. PubMed ID: 16294894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How different is the composition of the fouling layer of wastewater reuse and seawater desalination RO membranes?
Khan MT; Busch M; Molina VG; Emwas AH; Aubry C; Croue JP
Water Res; 2014 Aug; 59():271-82. PubMed ID: 24810743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunities of Reducing the Energy Consumption of Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination by Exploiting Salinity Gradients.
Aumesquet-Carreto MÁ; Ortega-Delgado B; García-Rodríguez L
Membranes (Basel); 2022 Oct; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36363601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Integration of an anaerobic fluidized-bed membrane bioreactor (MBR) with zeolite adsorption and reverse osmosis (RO) for municipal wastewater reclamation: Comparison with an anoxic-aerobic MBR coupled with RO.
Li Y; Sim LN; Ho JS; Chong TH; Wu B; Liu Y
Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125569. PubMed ID: 31864040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Osmotic versus conventional membrane bioreactors integrated with reverse osmosis for water reuse: Biological stability, membrane fouling, and contaminant removal.
Luo W; Phan HV; Xie M; Hai FI; Price WE; Elimelech M; Nghiem LD
Water Res; 2017 Feb; 109():122-134. PubMed ID: 27883917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The feasibility of nanofiltration membrane bioreactor (NF-MBR)+reverse osmosis (RO) process for water reclamation: Comparison with ultrafiltration membrane bioreactor (UF-MBR)+RO process.
Tay MF; Liu C; Cornelissen ER; Wu B; Chong TH
Water Res; 2018 Feb; 129():180-189. PubMed ID: 29149673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterisation of RO fouling in an integrated MBR/RO system for wastewater reuse.
Moreno J; Monclús H; Stefani M; Cortada E; Aumatell J; Adroer N; De Lamo-Castellví S; Comas J
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):780-8. PubMed ID: 23306255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An empirical determination of the whole-life cost of FO-based open-loop wastewater reclamation technologies.
Jalab R; Awad AM; Nasser MS; Minier-Matar J; Adham S; Judd SJ
Water Res; 2019 Oct; 163():114879. PubMed ID: 31336205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethinylestradiol removal of membrane bioreactor effluent by reverse osmosis and UV/H
Fonseca MJDC; Silva JRPD; Borges CP; Fonseca FVD
J Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 282():111948. PubMed ID: 33486235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenges of municipal wastewater reclamation for irrigation by MBR and NF/RO: Physico-chemical and microbiological parameters, and emerging contaminants.
Racar M; Dolar D; Karadakić K; Čavarović N; Glumac N; Ašperger D; Košutić K
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 722():137959. PubMed ID: 32208282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Membrane-based technology in water and resources recovery from the perspective of water social circulation: A review.
Wang H; Yang J; Zhang H; Zhao J; Liu H; Wang J; Li G; Liang H
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jan; 908():168277. PubMed ID: 37939956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reverse osmosis performance on stripped phenolic sour water treatment - A study on the effect of oil and grease and osmotic pressure.
Bastos PDA; Santos MA; Carvalho PJ; Crespo JG
J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110229. PubMed ID: 32148299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Necessity of direct energy and ammonium recovery for carbon neutral municipal wastewater reclamation in an innovative anaerobic MBR-biochar adsorption-reverse osmosis process.
Zhang X; Gu J; Liu Y
Water Res; 2022 Mar; 211():118058. PubMed ID: 35042076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
