These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690111)

  • 21. Neural Underpinnings of the Decline of Topographical Memory in Mild Cognitive Impairment.
    Boccia M; Silveri MC; Sabatini U; Guariglia C; Nemmi F
    Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen; 2016 Dec; 31(8):618-630. PubMed ID: 27307142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociating spatial strategies in animal research: Critical methodological review with focus on egocentric navigation and the hippocampus.
    Johnsen SHW; Rytter HM
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2021 Jul; 126():57-78. PubMed ID: 33771535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. From genes to brain development to phenotypic behavior: "dorsal-stream vulnerability" in relation to spatial cognition, attention, and planning of actions in Williams syndrome (WS) and other developmental disorders.
    Atkinson J; Braddick O
    Prog Brain Res; 2011; 189():261-83. PubMed ID: 21489394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Egocentric and allocentric memory as assessed by virtual reality in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.
    Weniger G; Ruhleder M; Lange C; Wolf S; Irle E
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Feb; 49(3):518-27. PubMed ID: 21185847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Representations and processes of human spatial competence.
    Gunzelmann G; Lyon DR
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Oct; 3(4):741-59. PubMed ID: 25164508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The human parahippocampal cortex subserves egocentric spatial learning during navigation in a virtual maze.
    Weniger G; Siemerkus J; Schmidt-Samoa C; Mehlitz M; Baudewig J; Dechent P; Irle E
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2010 Jan; 93(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 19683063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. East is not right: Spatial compatibility differs between egocentric and cardinal retrieval.
    Wang Q; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1250-1279. PubMed ID: 29966492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Navigation strategy in macaque monkeys: An exploratory experiment in virtual reality.
    Taillade M; N'Kaoua B; Gross C
    J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Oct; 326():108336. PubMed ID: 31276693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Developmental time course of the acquisition of sequential egocentric and allocentric navigation strategies.
    Bullens J; Iglói K; Berthoz A; Postma A; Rondi-Reig L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Nov; 107(3):337-50. PubMed ID: 20598705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mongolian gerbils learn to navigate in complex virtual spaces.
    Thurley K; Henke J; Hermann J; Ludwig B; Tatarau C; Wätzig A; Herz AV; Grothe B; Leibold C
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():161-8. PubMed ID: 24631394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spatial cognition through the keyhole: how studying a real-world domain can inform basic science--and vice versa.
    Keehner M
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Oct; 3(4):632-47. PubMed ID: 25164502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stepping into a map: initial heading direction influences spatial memory flexibility.
    Gagnon SA; Brunyé TT; Gardony A; Noordzij ML; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Cogn Sci; 2014 Mar; 38(2):275-302. PubMed ID: 23855500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How directions of route descriptions influence orientation specificity: the contribution of spatial abilities.
    Meneghetti C; Muffato V; Varotto D; De Beni R
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):445-461. PubMed ID: 26898648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Embodied spatial cognition.
    Trafton JG; Harrison AM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Oct; 3(4):686-706. PubMed ID: 25164505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of egocentric and allocentric spatial representations from childhood to elderly age.
    Ruggiero G; D'Errico O; Iachini T
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):259-72. PubMed ID: 25805435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Action compatibility in spatial knowledge developed through virtual navigation.
    Wang Q; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT
    Psychol Res; 2020 Feb; 84(1):177-191. PubMed ID: 29318375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial Updating Strategy Affects the Reference Frame in Path Integration.
    He Q; McNamara TP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1073-1079. PubMed ID: 28497363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of Bilateral Vestibulopathy on Spatial and Nonspatial Cognition: A Systematic Review.
    Dobbels B; Peetermans O; Boon B; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Van Rompaey V
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):757-765. PubMed ID: 31242136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining reference frame interaction in spatial memory using a distribution analysis.
    Street WN; Wang RF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 26032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Not all those who wander are lost: Spatial exploration patterns and their relationship to gender and spatial memory.
    Gagnon KT; Thomas BJ; Munion A; Creem-Regehr SH; Cashdan EA; Stefanucci JK
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():108-117. PubMed ID: 30015210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.