BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690414)

  • 1. The quest for population-level cancer recurrence data; current deficiencies and targets for improvement.
    In H; Simon CA; Phillips JL; Posner MC; Ko CY; Winchester DP
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 May; 111(6):657-62. PubMed ID: 25690414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lack of Cancer Recurrence Data in Large Databases: A National Survey of Hospital Cancer Registries.
    In H; Solsky I; Simon CA; Winchester DP
    J Surg Res; 2019 Mar; 235():551-559. PubMed ID: 30691842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cancer recurrence: an important but missing variable in national cancer registries.
    In H; Bilimoria KY; Stewart AK; Wroblewski KE; Posner MC; Talamonti MS; Winchester DP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 May; 21(5):1520-9. PubMed ID: 24504926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variability in interhospital trauma data coding and scoring: A challenge to the accuracy of aggregated trauma registries.
    Arabian SS; Marcus M; Captain K; Pomphrey M; Breeze J; Wolfe J; Bugaev N; Rabinovici R
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Sep; 79(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 26307866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cancer Registries: Can We Improve the Quality of Thyroid Cancer Data?
    Kiernan CM; Whiteside MA; Solorzano CC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 May; 24(5):1202-1207. PubMed ID: 27730372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of data reported on abdominal aortic aneurysm repair--a comparison between a national vascular and a national administrative registry.
    Haug ES; Romundstad P; Saether OD; Jørgenvåg R; Myhre HO
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Jun; 29(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 15878531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethnicity coding in a regional cancer registry and in Hospital Episode Statistics.
    Jack RH; Linklater KM; Hofman D; Fitzpatrick J; Møller H
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Nov; 6():281. PubMed ID: 17096838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Establishing hospital-based trauma registry systems: lessons from Kenya.
    Stevens KA; Paruk F; Bachani AM; Wesson HH; Wekesa JM; Mburu J; Mwangi JM; Saidi H; Hyder AA
    Injury; 2013 Dec; 44 Suppl 4():S70-4. PubMed ID: 24377783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using tumor registry resources in analyzing concordance with guidelines and outcomes.
    Bookman MA
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2000 Nov; 14(11A):104-7. PubMed ID: 11195403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency and determinants of missing data in clinical and prognostic variables recently added to SEER.
    Kim HM; Goodman M; Kim BI; Ward KC
    J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(3):120-31. PubMed ID: 22223054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the quality of industry and occupation data at a central cancer registry.
    Armenti KR; Celaya MO; Cherala S; Riddle B; Schumacher PK; Rees JR
    Am J Ind Med; 2010 Oct; 53(10):995-1001. PubMed ID: 20860053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflicting race/ethnicity reports: lessons for improvement in data quality.
    Webster PS; Fulton JP; Sampangi S
    J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 24643214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are statewide trauma registries comparable? Reaching for a national trauma dataset.
    Mann NC; Guice K; Cassidy L; Wright D; Koury J
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Sep; 13(9):946-53. PubMed ID: 16902047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance audits of community screening mammography practices: availability of active follow-up for data collection and outcome assessment.
    Brown ML; Houn F
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):825-9. PubMed ID: 8092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma: a report from the National Cancer Data Base, 2004-2010.
    Wilke LG; Czechura T; Wang C; Lapin B; Liederbach E; Winchester DP; Yao K
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Dec; 149(12):1296-305. PubMed ID: 25390819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The challenges of abstracting reliable information on patient race and ethnicity: initial observations from the Data Improvement Project on Patient Ethnicity and Race (DIPPER).
    Webster PS; Fulton J; Rousseau D
    J Registry Manag; 2012; 39(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 23599032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maximizing the cancer registry role and data utilization.
    Barzilay X
    J Registry Manag; 2011; 38(4):206-8. PubMed ID: 23270095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Legislation of cancer registries in Japan- an outline of the national cancer registry].
    Nishino Y
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2015 Apr; 42(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 25963684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancer registry enrichment via linkage with hospital-based electronic medical records: a pilot investigation.
    Hernandez MN; Voti L; Feldman JD; Tannenbaum SL; Scharber W; Mackinnon JA; Lee DJ; Huang YX
    J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 23778697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.