59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690648)
1. Gastrectomy and D2 Lymphadenectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to Conventional Techniques.
Cheng H; Hsiao CW; Clymer JW; Schwiers ML; Tibensky BN; Patel L; Ferko NC; Chekan E
Int J Surg Oncol; 2015; 2015():397260. PubMed ID: 26075090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized clinical trial of skin closure by subcuticular suture or skin stapling after elective colorectal cancer surgery.
Kobayashi S; Ito M; Yamamoto S; Kinugasa Y; Kotake M; Saida Y; Kobatake T; Yamanaka T; Saito N; Moriya Y
Br J Surg; 2015 Apr; 102(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 25727933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Higher frequency of anastomotic leakage with stapled compared to hand-sewn ileocolic anastomosis in a large population-based study.
Gustafsson P; Jestin P; Gunnarsson U; Lindforss U
World J Surg; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1834-9. PubMed ID: 25708508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collateral thermal damage to the pancreas by ultrasonic instruments during lymph node dissection in laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Fujita T; Ohta M; Ozaki Y; Takahashi Y; Miyazaki S; Harada T; Iino I; Kikuchi H; Hiramatsu Y; Kamiya K; Konno H
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2015 Aug; 8(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 25706186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An umbrella review of the surgical performance of Harmonic ultrasonic devices and impact on patient outcomes.
Kloosterman R; Wright GWJ; Salvo-Halloran EM; Ferko NC; Mennone JZ; Clymer JW; Ricketts CD; Tommaselli GA
BMC Surg; 2023 Jun; 23(1):180. PubMed ID: 37386399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Harmonic devices in surgical oncology: an umbrella review of the evidence.
Cheng H; Clymer JW; Sadeghirad B; Ferko NC; Cameron CG; Amaral JF
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 16(1):2. PubMed ID: 29301552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang JF; Zhang SZ; Zhang NY; Wu ZY; Feng JY; Ying LP; Zhang JJ
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 14():90. PubMed ID: 27030355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Study of celiac artery variations and related surgical techniques in gastric cancer.
Huang Y; Mu GC; Qin XG; Chen ZB; Lin JL; Zeng YJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jun; 21(22):6944-51. PubMed ID: 26078572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.
Viñuela EF; Gonen M; Brennan MF; Coit DG; Strong VE
Ann Surg; 2012 Mar; 255(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 22330034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultrasonic dissection versus conventional electrocautery during gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Sun ZC; Xu WG; Xiao XM; Yu WH; Xu DM; Xu HM; Gao HL; Wang RX
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 25690648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
Wei HB; Wei B; Qi CL; Chen TF; Huang Y; Zheng ZH; Huang JL; Fang JF
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2011 Dec; 21(6):383-90. PubMed ID: 22146158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery in mastectomy for breast cancer - a meta-analysis.
Currie A; Chong K; Davies GL; Cummins RS
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 38(10):897-901. PubMed ID: 22704049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in Asia: a meta-analysis.
Zhang CD; Chen SC; Feng ZF; Zhao ZM; Wang JN; Dai DQ
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Aug; 23(4):365-77. PubMed ID: 23917592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonically activated shears versus electrocautery in open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Choi MG; Oh SJ; Noh JH; Sohn TS; Kim S; Bae JM
Gastric Cancer; 2014; 17(3):556-61. PubMed ID: 24048759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
