These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690687)

  • 21. Comparison of the effects of various periodontal rotary instruments on surface characteristics of root surface.
    Kishida M; Sato S; Ito K
    J Oral Sci; 2004 Mar; 46(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15141717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments--an in vitro profilometric and SEM study.
    Singh S; Uppoor A; Nayak D
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2012 Feb; 20(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 22437673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single-rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips.
    Yukna RA; Scott JB; Aichelmann-Reidy ME; LeBlanc DM; Mayer ET
    J Periodontol; 1997 May; 68(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 9182738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study.
    Profili F; Sparabombe S; Tawse Smith A; D'Isidoro O; Quaranta A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Oct; 5(5):519-527. PubMed ID: 31687186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of EDTA gel conditioning exposure time on periodontitis-affected human root surfaces: surface topography and PDL cell adhesion.
    Gamal AY; Mailhot JM
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2003 Jan; 5(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 12666951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Loss of tooth substance during root planing with various periodontal instruments: an in vitro study.
    Obeid P; Bercy P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 15838684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of the Vector scaler system on human teeth: a systematic review.
    Slot DE; Koster TJ; Paraskevas S; Van der Weijden GA
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2008 Aug; 6(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 18768018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro.
    Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Evaluation of the clinical effects and scanning electron microscopic observation of different kinds of ultrasonic scaler used in subgingival scaling].
    Ge LH; Shu R
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2007 Apr; 16(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17546380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of root planing on surface topography: an in-vivo randomized experimental trial.
    Rosales-Leal JI; Flores AB; Contreras T; Bravo M; Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA; Mesa F
    J Periodontal Res; 2015 Apr; 50(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 24824304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Er:YAG Laser, ultrasonic system, and curette produce different profiles on dentine root surfaces: an in vitro study.
    de Mendonça AC; Máximo MB; Rodrigues JA; Arrais CA; de Freitas PM; Duarte PM
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Apr; 26(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 18307394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Ultrasonic instrumentation versus hand instrumentation in periodontics. A review of the literature].
    Deblauwe BM; van der Weijden GA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1992 Jul; 99(7):239-44. PubMed ID: 11819997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments.
    Jotikasthira NE; Lie T; Leknes KN
    J Clin Periodontol; 1992 Sep; 19(8):560-9. PubMed ID: 1447381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Ultrasonic subgingival root planing and EDTA etching in a one-step procedure.
    Blomlöf J; Blomlöf L; Lindskog S
    Swed Dent J; 1997; 21(6):213-9. PubMed ID: 9505333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of two ultrasonic instruments on root surfaces.
    Woodruff HC; Levin MP; Brady JM
    J Periodontol; 1975 Feb; 46(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 1090720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In vitro evaluation of Er:YAG laser scaling of subgingival calculus in comparison with ultrasonic scaling.
    Aoki A; Miura M; Akiyama F; Nakagawa N; Tanaka J; Oda S; Watanabe H; Ishikawa I
    J Periodontal Res; 2000 Oct; 35(5):266-77. PubMed ID: 11005154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.