These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690773)

  • 21. Maximizing audibility and speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression by estimating audible bandwidth.
    McCreery RW; Brennan MA; Hoover B; Kopun J; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):e24-7. PubMed ID: 23104144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of conventional and in-situ audiometry on participants with varying levels of sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kiessling J; Leifholz M; Unkel S; Pons-Kühnemann J; Jespersen CT; Pedersen JN
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 25597462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An initial-fit comparison of two generic hearing aid prescriptive methods (NAL-NL2 and CAM2) to individuals having mild to moderately severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Johnson EE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 23357807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.
    Levy SC; Freed DJ; Nilsson M; Moore BC; Puria S
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e214-24. PubMed ID: 25856543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sound Quality Effects of an Adaptive Nonlinear Frequency Compression Processor with Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Glista D; Hawkins M; Vaisberg JM; Pourmand N; Parsa V; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):552-563. PubMed ID: 30395533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Phoneme Perception Test Method for High-Frequency Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Schmitt N; Winkler A; Boretzki M; Holube I
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 May; 27(5):367-379. PubMed ID: 27179256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Glasberg BR; Puria S
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):907-22. PubMed ID: 18685497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
    Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Segmental and Suprasegmental Perception in Children Using Hearing Aids.
    Wenrich KA; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017; 28(10):901-912. PubMed ID: 29130438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Patient-Centered, Provider-Facilitated Approach to the Refinement of Nonlinear Frequency Compression Parameters Based on Subjective Preference Ratings of Amplified Sound Quality.
    Johnson EE; Light KC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Sep; 26(8):689-702. PubMed ID: 26333877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing Speech Audibility via Syllabic-Rate Neural Responses in Adults and Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
    Pendyala V; Sethares W; Easwar V
    Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241227815. PubMed ID: 38545698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Are two ears not better than one?
    McArdle RA; Killion M; Mennite MA; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Mar; 23(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 22436115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Listening Effort and Speech Recognition with Frequency Compression Amplification for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Brennan MA; Lewis D; McCreery R; Kopun J; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):823-837. PubMed ID: 28972471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.