These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690777)

  • 1. Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.
    Smeds K; Wolters F; Rung M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):183-96. PubMed ID: 25690777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. List equivalency of the AzBio sentence test in noise for listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity or cochlear implants.
    Schafer EC; Pogue J; Milrany T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(7):501-9. PubMed ID: 22992257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Predict Hearing Aid Satisfaction in Loud Noisy Environments.
    Seper E; Kuk F; Korhonen P; Slugocki C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):302-314. PubMed ID: 30461409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common Sound Scenarios: A Context-Driven Categorization of Everyday Sound Environments for Application in Hearing-Device Research.
    Wolters F; Smeds K; Schmidt E; Christensen EK; Norup C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jul; 27(7):527-40. PubMed ID: 27406660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.
    Holder JT; Sheffield SW; Gifford RH
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):e50-5. PubMed ID: 26756155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Watts KL; Smith SL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
    Rudner M; Lunner T; Behrens T; Thorén ES; Rönnberg J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):577-89. PubMed ID: 22967733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a "direct-comparison" approach to automatic switching in omnidirectional/directional hearing aids.
    Summers V; Grant KW; Walden BE; Cord MT; Surr RK; Elhilali M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Oct; 19(9):708-20. PubMed ID: 19418710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method for realistic, conversational signal-to-noise ratio estimation.
    Mansour N; Marschall M; May T; Westermann A; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Mar; 149(3):1559. PubMed ID: 33765784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal-to-noise.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 22031677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Small SA; Sharma M; Bradford M; Mandikal Vasuki PR
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):305-317. PubMed ID: 28863034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels.
    Recker KL; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefit of Higher Maximum Force Output on Listening Effort in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: A Pupillometry Study.
    Bianchi F; Wendt D; Wassard C; Maas P; Lunner T; Rosenbom T; Holmberg M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1220-1232. PubMed ID: 30807542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of normal-hearing listeners on the Repeat-Recall test in different noise configurations.
    Kuk F; Slugocki C; Ruperto N; Korhonen P
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 32820697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.