These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690779)

  • 1. Evaluation of iPod-Based Automated Tinnitus Pitch Matching.
    Wunderlich R; Stein A; Engell A; Lau P; Waasem L; Shaykevich A; Rudack C; Pantev C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 25690779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-automated tinnitus assessment: noise-band matching, maskability, and residual inhibition.
    Henry JA; Roberts LE; Ellingson RM; Thielman EJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):486-504. PubMed ID: 23886426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-Administered Tinnitus Pitch Matching versus a Conventional Audiometric Procedure.
    Kim TS; Yakunina N; Ryu YJ; Chung IJ; Nam EC
    Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28423381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.
    Hébert S
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1136-1144. PubMed ID: 30267085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development and test-retest reliability of a method for matching perceived location of tinnitus.
    Searchfield GD; Kobayashi K; Proudfoot K; Tevoitdale H; Irving S
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Dec; 256():1-8. PubMed ID: 26306658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consistent within-session measures of tinnitus.
    Penner MJ; Bilger RC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 1608262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of manual and computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch-matching.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 Mar; 41(2):121-38. PubMed ID: 15558367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring tinnitus parameters: loudness, pitch, and maskability.
    Mitchell CR; Vernon JA; Creedon TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):139-51. PubMed ID: 8318704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.
    Basile CÉ; Fournier P; Hutchins S; Hébert S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82995. PubMed ID: 24349414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-automated clinical technique for tinnitus quantification.
    Henry JA; Fausti SA; Flick CL; Helt WJ; Ellingson RM
    Am J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 9(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 10943023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a Mobile Device for Acoustic Coordinated Reset Neuromodulation Tinnitus Therapy.
    Hauptmann C; Wegener A; Poppe H; Williams M; Popelka G; Tass PA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):720-731. PubMed ID: 27718349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous measurement of tinnitus pitch and loudness.
    Penner MJ; Saran A
    Ear Hear; 1994 Dec; 15(6):416-21. PubMed ID: 7895937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measures of tinnitus: step size, matches to imagined tones, and masking patterns.
    Penner MJ; Klafter EJ
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):410-6. PubMed ID: 1487103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement and reliability of tinnitus loudness matching and pitch likeness rating.
    Hoare DJ; Edmondson-Jones M; Gander PE; Hall DA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114553. PubMed ID: 25478690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two computer-automated procedures for tinnitus pitch matching.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2001; 38(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 11732833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tinnitus evaluation: relationship between pitch matching and loudness, visual analog scale and tinnitus handicap inventory.
    Nascimento IDP; Almeida AA; Diniz J; Martins ML; Freitas TMMWC; Rosa MRDD
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2019; 85(5):611-616. PubMed ID: 29983341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tinnitus pitch: a comparison of three measurement methods.
    Tyler RS; Conrad-Armes D
    Br J Audiol; 1983 May; 17(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 6626779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring tinnitus loudness using constrained psychophysical scaling.
    Ward LM; Baumann M
    Am J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 18(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 19638478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory test result characteristics of subjects with and without tinnitus.
    Henry JA; James KE; Owens K; Zaugg T; Porsov E; Silaski G
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2009; 46(5):619-32. PubMed ID: 19882495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of tinnitus pitch matching using a web-based protocol.
    Mahboubi H; Ziai K; Brunworth J; Djalilian HR
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2012 Oct; 121(10):671-4. PubMed ID: 23130542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.