256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25690949)
1. A Clinical and Experimental Comparison of Time of Flight PET/MRI and PET/CT Systems.
Oprea-Lager DE; Yaqub M; Pieters IC; Reinhard R; van Moorselaar RJ; van den Eertwegh AJ; Hoekstra OS; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
Mol Imaging Biol; 2015 Oct; 17(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25690949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PET/MRI with diagnostic MR sequences vs PET/CT in the detection of abdominal and pelvic cancer.
Xin J; Ma Q; Guo Q; Sun H; Zhang S; Liu C; Zhai W
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):751-9. PubMed ID: 26971419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is there an additional value of ¹¹C-choline PET-CT to T2-weighted MRI images in the localization of intraprostatic tumor nodules?
Van den Bergh L; Koole M; Isebaert S; Joniau S; Deroose CM; Oyen R; Lerut E; Budiharto T; Mottaghy F; Bormans G; Van Poppel H; Haustermans K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Aug; 83(5):1486-92. PubMed ID: 22284686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of segmentation-based attenuation correction methods for PET/MRI: evaluation of bone and liver standardized uptake value with oncologic PET/CT data.
Kim JH; Lee JS; Song IC; Lee DS
J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1878-82. PubMed ID: 23081993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System.
Liu G; Cao T; Hu L; Zheng J; Pang L; Hu P; Gu Y; Shi H
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8213215. PubMed ID: 31886254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography Quantification Using Magnetic Resonance- and Computed Tomography-Based Attenuation Correction in Physiological Tissues and Lesions: A Whole-Body Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Study in 66 Patients.
Seith F; Gatidis S; Schmidt H; Bezrukov I; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; Schwenzer N
Invest Radiol; 2016 Jan; 51(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26348596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of time-of-flight PET on quantification errors in MR imaging-based attenuation correction.
Mehranian A; Zaidi H
J Nucl Med; 2015 Apr; 56(4):635-41. PubMed ID: 25745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No clinically relevant differences between positron emission tomography (PET) reconstructions based on low-dose or contrast-enhanced CT in combined integrated multiphase (18) F-Fluorethylcholine PET/CT for prostate cancer.
Behrendt FF; Lensing C; Keil S; Mottaghy FM; Verburg FA
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Aug; 60(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 27297449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of neuroendocrine liver metastases: a comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Armbruster M; Sourbron S; Haug A; Zech CJ; Ingrisch M; Auernhammer CJ; Nikolaou K; Paprottka PM; Rist C; Reiser MF; Sommer WH
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 24002080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective Comparison of 99mTc-MDP Scintigraphy, Combined 18F-NaF and 18F-FDG PET/CT, and Whole-Body MRI in Patients with Breast and Prostate Cancer.
Minamimoto R; Loening A; Jamali M; Barkhodari A; Mosci C; Jackson T; Obara P; Taviani V; Gambhir SS; Vasanawala S; Iagaru A
J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1862-8. PubMed ID: 26405167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Multiphase Level-Set Method.
An HJ; Seo S; Kang H; Choi H; Cheon GJ; Kim HJ; Lee DS; Song IC; Kim YK; Lee JS
J Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 57(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 26697962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction of quantification errors in pelvic and spinal lesions caused by ignoring higher photon attenuation of bone in [18F]NaF PET/MR.
Schramm G; Maus J; Hofheinz F; Petr J; Lougovski A; Beuthien-Baumann B; Oehme L; Platzek I; van den Hoff J
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6468-76. PubMed ID: 26520736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [18F]fluoromethylcholine (FCH) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for lymph node staging of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 210 patients.
Poulsen MH; Bouchelouche K; Høilund-Carlsen PF; Petersen H; Gerke O; Steffansen SI; Marcussen N; Svolgaard N; Vach W; Geertsen U; Walter S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1666-71. PubMed ID: 22520686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control for quantitative multicenter whole-body PET/MR studies: A NEMA image quality phantom study with three current PET/MR systems.
Boellaard R; Rausch I; Beyer T; Delso G; Yaqub M; Quick HH; Sattler B
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5961-9. PubMed ID: 26429271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: comparison with standard CT attenuation correction.
Vontobel J; Liga R; Possner M; Clerc OF; Mikulicic F; Veit-Haibach P; Ter Voert EE; Fuchs TA; Stehli J; Pazhenkottil AP; Benz DC; Gräni C; Gaemperli O; Herzog B; Buechel RR; Kaufmann PA
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2015 Sep; 42(10):1574-80. PubMed ID: 26091704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the detection of small lesions using a state-of-the-art time-of-flight PET/CT system and small-voxel reconstructions.
Koopman D; van Dalen JA; Lagerweij MC; Arkies H; de Boer J; Oostdijk AH; Slump CH; Jager PL
J Nucl Med Technol; 2015 Mar; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25613334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective Comparison of 18F-Fluoromethylcholine Versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Have Rising PSA After Curative Treatment and Are Being Considered for Targeted Therapy.
Morigi JJ; Stricker PD; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Ho B; Nguyen Q; Hruby G; Fogarty G; Jagavkar R; Kneebone A; Hickey A; Fanti S; Tarlinton L; Emmett L
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1185-90. PubMed ID: 26112024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
